ShowHide the Study Notes (1,455 words)
122 OK, SECOND PASS.
CARRIED ON THIS PAGE: FIVE āyāt, four before and one appended; ONE duʻāʼ, unchanged; THREE reports, unchanged.
APPENDED: 7:13, THE VERB OF THE NAME SAID OF IBLĪS. This entry’s own DESCRIPTION has named Iblīs’s refusal as the creature’s claim for as long as it has existed, and the page did not carry the āyah that records it — the entry argued from a scene the reader could not see. What is said to him is not that arrogance is wrong in general but THAT IT IS NOT HIS TO HAVE: mā yakūnu laka, it is not for you. The answer is immediate and is the exact opposite of what was claimed — among the lowly. Set beside 45:37, already carried, the two halves stand together: the grandeur is HIS in the heavens and the earth, and the creature who reached for it in the Garden went down from it. NOTHING ELSE WAS ADDED. The report track is already THREE, all ṣaḥīḥ — the cloak report by two routes, and Muslim 91a on what kibr actually is, which refuses the ascetic misreading. The duʻāʼ stands at ONE: Abū Dāwūd 873 with an-Nasāʼī 1132 names dhū l-kibriyāʼ, THE NAME’S OWN NOUN, in a supplication, and one other formula in the six editions names it too, Ḥudhayfah’s takbīr opening the night prayer, Allāhu akbar … dhū l-malakūti wa-l-jabarūti wa-l-kibriyāʼi wa-l-ʻaẓamah, at Abū Dāwūd 874 and an-Nasāʼī 1069 and 1145, not carried until its English is given (corrected in build 146; carried on the Duʻāʼ page from build 182, in the author’s English, A25).
STILL NAMED AND NOT CARRIED: 10:78, the SECOND AND ONLY OTHER kibriyāʼ, which would complete that pair as 45:37 half-completes it now. It was left rather than printed from a text not checked in this session, and is the first thing a third pass should carry here. Also named and not carried, all of creatures and in blame: 16:29, 39:60, 39:72, 40:27, 40:76. Quran.com consulted 18 September 2026; the addition is an append, so no existing sub-item index moved. THE FIRST PASS RECORD FOLLOWS.
CARRIED ON THIS PAGE: FOUR ayat. 59:23, the single occurrence of the Name and the last of the eight, shared with Names 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 and 9, its note now giving al-Qurṭubī’s readings; 40:35, mutakabbir of the man whose heart is sealed (corrected in build 146), SHARED WITH NAME 9; 45:37, the noun al-kibriyāʼ stated as His, SHARED WITH NAME 37 (corrected in build 146); and, ADDED, 7:146, those arrogant in the land without right, with Ibn Kathīr, carried at this Name only. The distinct Qurʼan-page verse count in Notes on This Edition moves from 337 to 338; sub-items 0 to 2 keep their positions, so SHARED_LOCI needs no remap.
NAMED HERE BUT NOT CARRIED ON THIS PAGE: 16:29, 39:60, 39:72, 40:27 and 40:76, all carried at NO Name; ADDED AT THE CHAT-END AUDIT OF 71–75, the entry names these verses, which this note did not list: 45:36, carried at NO Name;
CORRECTED ON THE RECORD, THE REF: it said the commentators hold that Form V carries no sense of affecting a quality when said of Allah, without naming one; al-Qurṭubī on 59:23 says exactly that, reading it in the sense of al-Kabīr, and he is now named, with his other readings, his note on the root’s sense of refusing to yield, Qatādah via aṭ-Ṭabarī and Ibn Kathīr. The Qurʼanic counts were computed from the Tanzil text: mutakabbir seven times, six of creatures; kibriyāʼ twice.
ROOT: shared-unmarked with no related Name is now shared-explicit with Name 37, Al-Kabīr, whose own entry names this Name; the gloss follows al-Qurṭubī with glossBasis ref, and a senseNote is added. THE DESC names no scholars, gives the readings, and distinguishes Al-Kabīr. ONE duʻāʼ: Abū Dāwūd 873, from ʻAwf ibn Mālik al-Ashjaʻī, carried at this Name only.
CORRECTED: it had no grade, which a Prophetic duʻāʼ must carry; the dataset grades read ṣaḥīḥ by al-Albānī at Abū Dāwūd 873 and at an-Nasāʼī 1132, which gives the words again in prostration, and both are now in the source and grade. Its note had said the words were said in bowing and then the like in prostration, which is Abū Dāwūd’s wording, and it now also gives the night of long recitation the report describes. THREE tracked aḥādīth. Abū Dāwūd 4090, from Abū Hurayrah, a ḥadīth qudsī, SHARED WITH NAME 78 as another portion: its Arabic had a colon after the opening words, and the book’s hadith Arabic is unpunctuated, so it is removed; Ibn Mājah 4174, the same report through Hannād, graded ṣaḥīḥ by al-Albānī, is added to the note; the source and grade strings are left identical to Name 78’s, as the book’s convention for shared reports requires. Muslim 91a, from ʻAbdullāh ibn Masʻūd, carried at this Name only: CORRECTED, the translation said a mustard seed’s weight, but 91a reads mithqālu dharratin, an atom’s weight; the mustard seed, ḥabbat khardal, is 91b’s wording, and 91b’s noun there is kibriyāʼ, which the note now records; its Arabic punctuation is removed, and the source now reads Muslim 91a alone, as the grade is. Muslim 2620, from Abū Saʻīd and Abū Hurayrah, SHARED WITH NAME 37 in identical wording: its note carried capitals and process remarks, now removed. The narrator discussion is kept here: Abū Dāwūd’s two teachers differ below ʻAṭāʼ ibn as-Sāʼib, Hannād naming al-Agharr Abū Muslim and Mūsā ibn Ismāʻīl naming Salmān al-Agharr, as the dataset text of 4090 confirms, so the identity of the two reports rests on Hannād’s line. The earlier record that al-Mizzī holds the two to be different men and that sunnah.com files them under narrator records 3482 and 1148 was not re-read in this pass and is kept only as a prior record. MEDS 10 no longer quotes the cloak report as Allah’s direct speech without its transmitter; it now relates it as a report the Prophet ﷺ gives from his Lord. POEMS 10 no longer says His supremacy never needs announcing, when the Qurʼan and the takbīr announce it; it now says it is declared because it is true. CH 10 checked and unchanged.
AUDIT, FINAL CHECK OF NAMES 1 TO 25: MEDS 10’s old teaching becomes the Prophet ﷺ in a report from Ibn Masʻūd, Muslim 91, pride is rejecting the truth and looking down on people; the greatness safe in His hands, casual hand imagery, becomes safe as His.
AFTER NAME 78: Abū Dāwūd 4090 carries three verdicts, all ṣaḥīḥ (al-Albānī, Muḥammad Muḥyī ad-Dīn ʻAbd al-Ḥamīd, Darussalam); the grade here and at Name 78 gave al-Albānī alone and now gives all three. AFTER THE CHAT-END AUDIT OF 81–85: the grade field of Abū Dāwūd 873; an-Nasāʼī 1132 (narrated by ʻAwf ibn Mālik al-Ashjaʻī) now gives every grader in the dataset’s rows, each attributed to its record (the grade survey).
IN BUILD 146, FROM THE PHASE 2 READING: the 40:35 note reads mutakabbir as the man whose heart is sealed, as the text printed does, the heart’s own reading being Abū ʻAmr’s, and the carried line is corrected in place; the note on Muslim 2620 says Name 37 reads the report for al-kibriyāʼ, as that page does; the duʻāʼ line records Ḥudhayfah’s takbīr as the second formula naming dhū l-kibriyāʼ, not carried until its English is given; the first pass record’s named line no longer lists 7:13, on this page since the second pass, and its carried line gives 45:37 as shared with Name 37; the ref and the 7:13 note no longer narrate the page’s own carrying; the notes record Ibn Mājah 4175, the cloak report from Ibn ʻAbbās, and an-Nasāʼī 1049, ʻAwf’s report again.
FROM THE CENSUS: the duʻāʼ source field cites the two records alone, ʻAwf ibn Mālik al-Ashjaʻī standing in the note. 10:78 and Ḥudhayfah’s takbīr wait on the author’s English (A25; both carried from build 182, in his English).
BY THE AUTHOR’S DECISIONS OF 2026-09-25, IN BUILD 182: 10:78 is carried in his English, the second al-kibriyāʼ, and Ḥudhayfah’s takbīr on the Duʻāʼ page in his English, ṣaḥīḥ in all four rows; the named line and the lines above say so in place, and the page’s no second in the six editions stands corrected since build 146 (A25).
IN BUILD 207, FROM THE READING OF THE GRADES: Muḥammad Fuʼād ʻAbd al-Bāqī is no longer named as a grader on this page: the row the ḥadīth dataset gives in his name is al-Albānī’s ruling as it is printed with ʻAbd al-Bāqī’s edition of Ibn Mājah, read at Shamela through its page reader, not in print, and the edition gives no verdict of its own beyond quoting az-Zawāʼid; al-Albānī’s grade stands where it stood, and earlier records keep their words.