ShowHide the Study Notes (1,510 words)
CARRIED ON THIS PAGE: FOUR ayat. 59:23 (al-Maliku l-Quddūs), the single verse in which Names 3 through 10 stand together and which is therefore SHARED WITH NAMES 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 AND 10, its note now giving Ibn Kathīr’s gloss; 20:114 (al-Maliku l-Ḥaqq), SHARED WITH NAME 78; 114:1–2, Lord, King and God of mankind, read by Ibn Kathīr as lordship, kingship and divinity; and 3:189 (lillāhi mulku s-samāwāti wa-l-arḍ).
NAMED HERE BUT NOT CARRIED ON THIS PAGE: 23:116, which repeats the al-Maliku l-Ḥaqq formula word for word and is carried at Name 42, a repetition of a carried formula not being ground; 1:4, carried at Name 84; 62:1, carried at Name 4; 54:55, carried at Name 70; 40:16, carried at Name 15 and Name 66 and Name 84; and 3:26, carried at Name 22 and Name 24 and Name 25 and Name 84 on the Qurʼan layer, and on the duʻāʼ layer at Names 24 and 84; ADDED AT THE CHAT-END AUDIT OF 71–75, the entry names these verses, which this note did not list: 39:67, carried at Name 20; 20:102–112, of which 20:111 is carried at Name 62 and Name 63; 20:113, carried at NO Name;
CORRECTED ON THE RECORD: the Qurʼan note and the ref said al-Ḥaqq at 20:114 qualifies the kingship, and this note called that classical iʻrāb correctly reflected. The three iʻrāb works checked — al-Jadwal fī Iʻrāb al-Qurʼān, al-Iʻrāb al-Muyassar and Darwīsh — parse al-Malik and al-Ḥaqq as two adjectives of Allah; the translation is now the Sovereign, the Truth, and al-Ḥaqq is identified as Name 51.
CORRECTED: the 3:189 note said the verse follows two verses about people taking credit for what they did not do; only 3:188 is, and the formula’s count is now given as eighteen verses.
CORRECTED: the 1:4 readings named only Ḥafṣ ʻan ʻĀṣim and al-Kisāʼī for Mālik; Ibn al-Jazarī gives ʻĀṣim, al-Kisāʼī, Yaʻqūb and Khalaf, the rest reading Malik. The four definite occurrences of the Name of Allah are 20:114, 23:116, 59:23 and 62:1; the desc’s both-senses claim now rests on the malik-or-mālik dispute al-Qurṭubī records (Abū ʻUbaydah and al-Mubarrad; Abū Ḥātim) and on Ibn Kathīr’s gloss, and the root on Ibn Fāris. TWO tracked aḥādīth. The Day-of-Judgment proclamation at Ṣaḥīḥ al-Bukhārī 4812, narrated by Abū Hurayrah, SHARED WITH NAME 20, ṣaḥīḥ and muttafaq ʻalayh, with a wording variance recorded rather than resolved: Muslim 2787 names the Day of Resurrection, has the heaven for the heavens, and adds tabāraka wa-taʻālā.
ADDED: that frame follows the route and not the book — al-Bukhārī 7382, through Saʻīd ibn al-Musayyab as Muslim’s is, has it too, while 4812 comes through Abū Salamah; al-Bukhārī 7413 gives the proclamation from Ibn ʻUmar. The Arabic printed is al-Bukhārī 4812’s, now in the book’s spelling as-samāwāt. And Muslim 758b, from Abū Hurayrah through Suhayl, ṣaḥīḥ and carried at this Name only: anā l-Malik, said twice every night once the first third of the night has passed; its note now records that the widely transmitted wording (al-Bukhārī 1145; Muslim 758a) has the last third and no anā l-Malik, and that among Muslim’s wordings the Name is in Suhayl’s alone. ONE duʻāʼ: Muslim 771a, ṣaḥīḥ, the opening supplication of the prayer in ʻAlī ibn Abī Ṭālib’s report, addressing the Name in its own definite form, anta l-Malik; it is shared with Names 13 and 71, and carried as a report at Name 91, and its Arabic now follows the book’s unpunctuated setting. The NAMES ref also names al-Bukhārī 6205 with Muslim 2143a and 2143b, on the man called king of kings — 2143b ending lā malika illā llāh, there is no king but Allah; these are cited, not carried, and no further grade is asserted for them here.
AUDIT, COHERENCE: the Muslim 771a note said Muslim files the report under supplication in the night prayer; the chapter placement is confirmed in the islamweb text of Ṣaḥīḥ Muslim, Kitāb Ṣalāt al-Musāfirīn, Bāb ad-Duʻāʼ fī Ṣalāt al-Layl wa-Qiyāmih, and the note now says printed editions place it there, since the chapter headings are not asserted here to be Muslim’s own wording. The same change is made at Name 13.
AUDIT, FINAL CHECK OF NAMES 1 TO 25: the ref gave Ṣaḥīḥ al-Bukhārī 4812 in a form the book does not use; al-Bukhārī 4812’s source field held the comparison with Muslim 2787, now in its note without the remark on a website’s English, and the source reads al-Bukhārī 4812; Muslim 2787 with the grade ṣaḥīḥ (muttafaq ʻalayh); Muslim 758b’s source no longer carries the narrator, who stands in its note, and its note no longer names a website. The gloss, mulk and milk, is not the sense the ref gives from Ibn Fāris and keeps glossBasis desc, left open.
AFTER NAME 84: two verses of the NAMED line, the Owner of the Day of Recompense and to whom belongs the sovereignty this Day, are now carried at Name 84 as well, and the line says so. AFTER THE CHAT-END AUDIT OF 1–99: the root gloss now rests on Ibn Fāris read in his own text, Maqāyīs al-Lughah, vol. 5, pp. 351–352 (Shamela 21710, pages 2401 and 2402): a sound root indicating strength in a thing and soundness, from which malaka, to own, because the hand over the thing is strong and sound; glossBasis is ref and the ref names the source. AFTER THE 1–40 HYGIENE READING: the segment of the named line that read 3:26 as carried on the Qurʼan layer at Names 22, 24, 25 and 84 now uses the named line’s own clause and says carried at Name 22 and Name 24 and Name 25 and Name 84, which is what verifyN reads and what it could not read before; the duʻāʼ layer at Names 24 and 84 is kept as it stood. The root was also recounted on the pointed text: 265 candidates, partitioned as 123 words of owning and ruling, 83 of the angel word, and 59 of other roots, summed by assertion in count_mlk.py. Stripped of its vowels al-malik and al-mulk are one string; told apart on the pointed text the definite al-Malik stands nine times, and five of the nine are the king of Egypt in Sūrat Yūsuf, at 12:43 and 12:50 and 12:54 and 12:72 and 12:76, leaving the four of Allah this entry names. The dominion formula after lillāhi or lahu stands in eighteen verses across fourteen sūrahs, as the entry and the note at 3:189 both say, and 38:10, where the question is asked of them and not of Him, is rightly not among them. Malīk indefinite at 54:55 is its one occurrence. Whether the angel word belongs to this root, which Ibn Fāris files at the hamzah, lām and kāf from al-alūkah while the concordances file it here, is the author’s to say: counting it in gives the root 206 words and leaving it out gives 123, and this entry claims neither figure. The keeper of the Fire at 43:77 is a proper name spelled like the root and is named here so that no later sweep takes it for the Name. One structural fact about this note itself, found while rebuilding its named line and reported rather than altered: its corrected section stands before its named line and not after, which no other note in the book does, so the named section here runs on to the end of the body and swallows the whole account of al-Bukhārī 4812, Muslim 758b and Muslim 771a. verifyN is unharmed by it, since it asserts only segments that carry a carried at clause, but it is the one thing in 1–40 that would want a full modern pass, and no pass is begun on it here.
AFTER THE STUDY-NOTE ORDER REPAIR: the corrected section of this note stood before the named line and not after it, which is the shape the line above reports; it now stands after it, and the verses the chat-end audit of 71 to 75 added are joined to the named line, where the other notes keep them. The named section therefore ends where it should and no longer runs on through the aḥādīth and the duʻāʼ to the foot of the note, which is what every reader of it in the kit had been given. Not a word inside any section was altered in the move, no verse was added or removed, and every carried at clause moved with the verse it belongs to. The line above also says that no other note in the book has the inverted shape, and that was wrong: Name 4 had it too, is repaired in the same way in this pass, and the order now holds at all ninety-nine.
IN BUILD 143, FROM THE PHASE 2 READING: the proclamation is cited al-Bukhārī 4812 alone, whose wording is the one printed, with Muslim 2787 in its note, and likewise at Name 20; the ref names the root once, from Ibn Fāris read in his own text; the shares above are completed, and 20:102–112 is recorded as carried only in 20:111.