ShowHide the Study Notes (1,383 words)
116 OK, SECOND PASS.
CARRIED ON THIS PAGE: FIVE āyāt, four before and one appended; ONE duʻāʼ, unchanged; TWO reports, one appended. THE NAME ITSELF WAS ALREADY COMPLETE — the definite al-Quddūs stands twice, 59:23 and 62:1, and both were carried. What the page lacked was the rest of the root’s classes, which is what this pass supplied.
APPENDED: 5:21, al-arḍ al-muqaddasah, the SECOND of the two places the root lands on a PLACE rather than on Allah, beside the valley of Ṭuwā at 20:12 already here. With both carried the page now shows THREE OF THE ROOT’S FOUR CLASSES: the Name (59:23, 62:1); what is MADE holy, passive (20:12, 5:21); creatures DECLARING His holiness, active (2:30).
THE FOURTH CLASS IS STILL MISSING AND IS NAMED AS MISSING: Rūḥ al-Qudus (2:87, 2:253, 5:110, 16:102). 2:87 was the intended fourth this pass and was LEFT OUT rather than printed from a text not checked in this session. It is the first thing a third pass should carry.
REPORT APPENDED: an-Nasāʼī 1732, from ʻAbd ar-Raḥmān ibn Abzā through his son and Dharr, ṣaḥīḥ (al-Albānī; Darussalam). A DIFFERENT COMPANION AND CHAIN from the Ubayy ibn Kaʻb report on the Duʻāʼ page, and the one where the voice is RAISED on the third rather than the word lengthened. This ref has named both all along without the page ever showing the second. Here the Name is said aloud, and said with al-Malik, as in both of its Qurʼanic occurrences. DUʻĀʼ LEFT AT ONE: the witr tasbīḥ is the only supplication built on this Name that the page carries (Abū Dāwūd 5085 stands beside it from build 182, by the author’s decision, A25); the words stand in sixteen records of the six, fifteen of them the witr tasbīḥ, and Abū Dāwūd 5085 has them ten times among what was said on rising at night, before the prayer (corrected in build 144). Nothing was substituted for the count. Checked 18 September 2026; every addition is an append, so no existing sub-item index moved, and no cross-reference was affected. THE FIRST PASS RECORD FOLLOWS.
CARRIED ON THIS PAGE: FOUR ayat, and only TWO of them are the Name. 59:23 and 62:1, THE ONLY TWO OCCURRENCES OF THE DEFINITE NAME, both pairing it with Al-Malik — 59:23 is shared with Names 3, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 and 10, while 62:1 is carried at this Name only. Then two root-forms pulling opposite ways: 20:12, al-muqaddas, passive, the valley made holy; and 2:30, nuqaddisu laka, active, the angels declaring holiness, read at quran.com/al-baqarah/30-33 and carried at no other Name, its Arabic set in house form and matching the Tanzil text.
NAMED HERE BUT NOT CARRIED ON THIS PAGE: 2:253, 5:110 and 16:102, of the Holy Spirit, all carried at NO Name; 79:16, the valley named again, carried at NO Name; and 17:44, cited in the note on the second āyah of this page, carried at Name 56; ADDED AT THE CHAT-END AUDIT OF 71–75, the entry names these verses, which this note did not list: 2:32, carried at Name 19 and Name 46; 57:1, 59:1 and 61:1, all carried at NO Name;
CORRECTED ON THE RECORD: the 2:30 note printed its production notes on the reader’s page — capitals, the session read, the house-form anchor — and those now live here; the reader’s note says the same thing plainly.
CORRECTED: that note and MEDS 4 called the angels’ words an objection or a credential; Ibn Kathīr says explicitly that they were not an objection to Allah but a question seeking the wisdom, and both now follow him, the reflection also no longer saying they were asked.
CORRECTED: the 20:12 note said Mūsā is told the sanctity of the place before anything else; 20:11–12 gives I am your Lord first, then the command, then the reason.
CORRECTED: POEMS 4 said the holy ground was dust that happened to stand near; the Qurʼan’s passive says it was made holy, and the line now reads He chose to set apart. The Qurʼan count was checked: the root stands ten times — 2:30, 2:87, 2:253, 5:21, 5:110, 16:102, 20:12, 59:23, 62:1, 79:16 — and every form except the two definite Names is said of a place, the Spirit, or the angels’ act. The root now rests on Ibn Fāris; the second side of the Name, magnification beside tanzīh, on as-Saʻdī; the ḍamma of quddūs on Thaʻlab as Ibn ʻĀshūr reports him. ONE tracked ḥadīth: Muslim 487a, ṣaḥīḥ, narrated by ʻĀʼishah, checked.
CORRECTED: its note said most commentators take ar-Rūḥ as Jibrīl and that the two words negate rather than describe; it now cites Abū l-ʻAbbās al-Qurṭubī (al-Mufhim) and Qāḍī ʻIyāḍ for Jibrīl and al-Qurṭubī’s gloss for the two words, and its Arabic drops a colon the book does not use. ONE duʻāʼ: Sunan an-Nasāʼī 1699, narrated by Ubayy ibn Kaʻb, checked — three times at the close of witr, lengthening the last — now graded ṣaḥīḥ by al-Albānī as well as Darussalam, with an-Nasāʼī 1732 (the voice raised on the third) and Sunan Abī Dāwūd 1430 cited in its note; carried at this Name only.
AUDIT, FINAL CHECK OF NAMES 1 TO 25: the ref and the duʻāʼ gave Ṣaḥīḥ Muslim, Sunan an-Nasāʼī and Sunan Abī Dāwūd in forms the book does not use; the duʻāʼ source now reads an-Nasāʼī 1699, with Ubayy ibn Kaʻb in the note; the gloss, which the ref sources to Ibn Fāris, now has glossBasis ref. AFTER THE CHAT-END AUDIT OF 81–85: the grade field of an-Nasāʼī 1699 now gives every grader in the dataset’s rows, each attributed to its record (the grade survey). AFTER THE 1–40 HYGIENE READING: three segments of the named line carried verse numbers with no carried at clause, which verifyN passes over in silence, and each is rebuilt from this page’s own fields: 2:87 and 2:253 and 5:110 and 16:102, of the Holy Spirit, now say all carried at NO Name; 5:21, the sanctified land, now says carried at NO Name; and 79:16, the valley named again, now says carried at NO Name. Nothing about the verses changed and no verse was added or removed; only the clause that makes the line assertable was supplied.
AFTER THE STUDY-NOTE ORDER REPAIR: the corrected section of this note stood before the named line and not after it, the only other note in the book to do so being Name 3; it now stands after it, and the verses the chat-end audit of 71 to 75 added are joined to the named line, where the other notes keep them. Not a word inside any section was altered in the move, no verse was added or removed, and every carried at clause moved with the verse it belongs to. The hygiene reading had reported the shape at Name 3 as the only one of the ninety-nine; this note is the second, both are repaired in this pass, and the order now holds at all ninety-nine.
IN BUILD 144, FROM THE PHASE 2 READING: the note under an-Nasāʼī 1732 gives the chain in its order, from Ibn Abzā through his son, from whom Dharr, from whom Salamah and Zubayd, from whom Shuʻbah, and no longer speaks of this entry’s ref; its grade names the record’s three rows, Abū Ghuddah, al-Albānī and Darussalam, Darussalam being Zubayr ʻAlī Zaʼī. The named line no longer lists 5:21, carried here since the second pass. The ref gives the root’s four classes in its own voice, 79:16 among what is made holy, and no longer narrates the page. The duʻāʼ line above is corrected: the witr tasbīḥ is the only supplication on this Name that the page carries, not the only one in the six; whether the page carries Abū Dāwūd 5085 as well is a reading item (it does, from build 182, by the author’s decision, A25).
BY THE AUTHOR’S DECISIONS OF 2026-09-25, IN BUILD 182: 2:87 is carried, Rūḥ al-Qudus, the root’s fourth class, in his English, with a note that the commentators read it as Jibrīl, and the named line no longer lists it; Abū Dāwūd 5085 is carried on the Duʻāʼ page beside the witr tasbīḥ, in the English the page already gives the words, graded as the pinned rows give it, and the duʻāʼ lines above say so in place (A25).