ShowHide the Study Notes (1,927 words)
124 OK, PROMISE-CHECKER PASS.
APPENDED: 89:15–16, an exact share with Name 21, now linked both ways. This entry’s DESCRIPTION counts the fourth form of k-r-m and names Allah honouring man twice AT 89:15 — and the page did not carry the āyah. Both occurrences are in it, akramahu and akramani, and the man’s misreading of his own honouring is the point: widening taken as honour, straitening as humiliation, and the āyāt after correct him.
FALSE POSITIVE ON THE RECORD: the checker also reports Muslim 591, named in the description beside 592a; they are one supplication by two routes and 592a IS carried here. Text from Name 21, already verified. THE FIRST PASS RECORD FOLLOWS.
CARRIED ON THIS PAGE: six āyāt, five before and one appended. 55:27 and 55:78, the Name’s two places, stay linked exactly with Name 41; 55:26, 7:143 and 17:70 unchanged in text. Appended: 22:18 from wa-man yuhini llāh, none to honor the one Allah abases, new to the book. 55:26 and 55:27 are linked with Name 96, which prints them together in other English, as another portion. The distinct verse count moves from 649 to 650.
NAMED HERE BUT NOT CARRIED ON THIS PAGE: 49:13, carried at Name 31 and Name 42; 89:17 and 96:3, carried at Name 42; 17:62, carried at Name 72; 21:26, 36:27, 37:42, 51:24, 70:35, 12:21 and 80:13, all carried at NO Name.
CORRECTED ON THE RECORD, THE COUNT: j-l-l is counted at Name 41 and k-r-m at Name 42; this Name’s words are counted on the pointed Tanzil text (count_jlk.py; asserted in build_N85.py). JALĀL 2, and nowhere else: 55:27 (dhū, of the Face) and 55:78 (dhī, of your Lord). THE FOURTH FORM OF K-R-M, the form of ikrām, 12: IKRĀM 2, in the Name; AKRAMA OF ALLAH 2, at 89:15, fa-akramahu and the man’s rabbī akramani; MUKRIM DENIED 1, at 22:18; MUKRAM, the honored, 5 (21:26, 36:27, 37:42, 51:24, 70:35); OF PEOPLE 2 (12:21, akrimī mathwāhu; 89:17, you do not honor the orphan). Excluded: the elative akram (49:13, 96:3), and the second form, mukarramah (80:13), karramta (17:62) and karramnā (17:70). THE REFRAIN which MEDS 85 counts, fa-bi-ayyi ālāʼi rabbikumā tukadhdhibān, stands 31 times in the sūrah’s 78 āyāt, as it says. THE SIX ḤADĪTH EDITIONS carry the phrase in 23 records, and in 24 with Ibn Mājah 706, where ʻAbd Allāh ibn Zayd’s verse reads dhā l-jalāli wa-dhā l-ikrām, among them Muslim 591, 592a, 592b and 592c, Abū Dāwūd 1495, at-Tirmidhī 3507, 3524, 3525 and 3544, an-Nasāʼī 1300, Ibn Mājah 928 and 3858. FOUND / CORRECTED / REMOVED, AS UNVERIFIED: THE 17:70 NOTE called that āyah THE ONLY QURʼANIC EVIDENCE FOR THE SECOND HALF OF THE NAME: false. Karramnā is the second form, and the fourth form, the form of ikrām itself, is said of Allah at 89:15 (His honoring the man He tries, carried at Name 21) and at 22:18 (none to honor the one He abases, now appended); rewritten. THE 592a DUʻĀʼ NOTE called it the only transmitted supplication in which this Name is the whole address; Muslim 591 closes on the same words and at-Tirmidhī 3525 commands the vocative alone; struck. THE DESC made jalāl greatness that makes the beholder small and ikrām the honoring that draws him in, and said majesty alone would have sufficed at 55:27, from no source read (aṭ-Ṭabarī at 55:27 glosses neither word); called the post-prayer words what every praying Muslim says five times a day (Muslim 591 and 592a say he said it on turning from, or giving the salām of, his prayer); rebuilt on the count. THE REF’s scholars differ on the Greatest Name named no scholar; struck, the three records given. THE ROOT FIELD was null, recorded at Name 41 as a deliberate one-sided edge; both roots now stated, linked to Name 41, and Name 41’s senseNote updated. THE STUDY NOTE HERE said 55:78 describes the Name of the Lord; dhī agrees with rabbika, the Lord, and Name 41 records the reading dhū, of the Name, from Ibn ʻĀmir; it also gave al-Albānī’s grade as resting on the Rabīʻah chain, which Name 41 struck as unchecked. THE QURʼAN NOTES carried capitals, live-read remarks and arguments about the reflection and the poem (55:26, 7:143, 17:70); rewritten, and the 7:143 note now says tajallā is of j-l-w, not the root of jalāl. THE ḤADĪTH NOTES: the aliẓẓū note restated Name 41’s grade discussion at length; shortened to at-Tirmidhī’s verdict and the Rabīʻah wording, Name 41’s record; the Muslim 1348 note called the boasting the ikrām this Name names (no source read) and pointed at MEDS; rewritten.
MEDS 85: the Name placed in the middle of the sūrah (55:27 is early); every face known on the Day (55:41: the guilty known by their marks); Mūsā asking out of love (no source read); the veil revocable at will; He is nearer (50:16 has We); ikrām runs both ways, He deserves honor and confers it (no source read), rebuilt on 89:15 and 17:70; after an obligatory prayer, five times a day; quotations of 55:27, Muslim 179a, 482, 592a and 1348 set to the book’s English; one might think the moment calls for majesty alone, narrowed from a statement.
POEMS 85: Muslim 179a and 55:27 set to the book’s English. CH 85 read; no change.
READ: the Tanzil text, every hit in its verse, and the refrain in ar-Raḥmān. Aṭ-Ṭabarī at 55:27, through the tafsir dataset; his files for 55:78, 17:70, 22:18 and 89:15, and Ibn Kathīr’s for 55:27 and 55:78, were not read here: they were taken not to reach the words, and at the pinned tafsīr dataset every one of them does (corrected in build 142); Name 41’s readings of Ibn Kathīr, al-Qurṭubī and al-Baghawī are relied on. Letter by letter with their grade rows: Muslim 591, 592a and 1348; Ibn Mājah 928 and 3858; at-Tirmidhī 3524, 3525 and 3544; Abū Dāwūd 1495; the six editions swept for the phrase.
NOT READ: Ibn Fāris for j-l-l; al-Ghazālī’s al-Maqṣad al-Asnā; Aḥmad’s Musnad and an-Nasāʼī’s as-Sunan al-Kubrā. A SECOND READING BEFORE SHIPPING found MEDS 85 and POEMS 85 saying Mūsā was not rebuked for asking, without the repentance in the same āyah (aṭ-Ṭabarī at 7:143, with Mujāhid: tubtu ilayk, from my asking for the vision), now given in MEDS 85 and the 7:143 note and narrowed in the poem to no rebuke is written; MEDS 85 giving at-Tirmidhī’s verdict as gharīb alone, where he adds not preserved; and the record count missing Ibn Mājah 706; all corrected.
OPEN: MEDS 85’s two halves not a trade-off, and POEMS 85’s both words at the end of all things, are the author’s reflections. Name 96’s English for 55:26 (the earth for ʻalayhā) differs from this page’s, for Name 96’s pass — since closed, as recorded below. The English title The Lord of Majesty and Generosity is the author’s.
COHERENCE: 55:27 and 55:78 exact with Name 41; 55:26 and 55:27 linked with Names 74 and 96 as another portion (Name 74 linked in build 143). Name 51’s NAMED line repaired for 22:18. Name 41’s root senseNote updated. AFTER THE CHAT-END AUDIT OF 81–85: the grade field of Abū Dāwūd 1495 now gives every grader in the dataset’s rows, each attributed to its record (the grade survey). AFTER THE CHAT-END AUDIT OF 81–85: POEMS 85’s that is what the moment called for narrowed to seemed to call for, as MEDS 85 was at the pass; the audit of 81–85 found no other echo of a struck claim on the creative pages.
AFTER NAME 96: Name 96 now prints 55:26–27 in this page’s English, Everyone upon it is perishing, so the open item on its English is closed, and this page’s 55:26 note says Name 96 prints it with 55:27 as one portion. AFTER THE CHAT-END AUDIT OF 1–99: the item left for Name 96 is closed: its English for 55:26 now reads Everyone upon it is perishing, identical with this page.
ON THE AUTHOR’S DECISION, THE ENGLISH TITLE: the author has changed the title from The Lord of Majesty and Generosity to The Lord of Majesty and Honour. Ikrām is the verbal noun of the fourth form of k-r-m, which is a thing done to someone rather than a quality held: honouring, not generosity, and the book already gives Al-Karīm at Name 42 as The Generous, so the old title spent that English twice. The title changes in every array that prints it and nowhere else: the two āyāt, the supplications and the reports keep Possessor of Majesty and Generosity as they stand, here and at every other Name that carries them. Whether that English should follow the title is a further question and is not settled here. Dhū as Lord is likewise not literal — it is Possessor of — and is left as the author’s.
ON THE AUTHOR’S LIST, THE RECORDED GROUP: the list gathers in one place the passages of the creative pages that are the author’s own and are kept, so that no later pass corrects them. The entries at this Name are MEDS 85, that the two halves of the Name are not a trade-off, and POEMS 85, that both words are given at the end of all things. The OPEN section already records both as the author’s; that record stands, the passages are unchanged, and they stay with him.
ON THE AUTHOR’S LIST, THE TITLE AND THE RENDERINGS: Name 85 now reads The Lord of Majesty and Honour while the āyāt, the supplications and the reports still read Possessor of Majesty and Generosity. All twenty places were found and weighed one at a time, and every one of them is the book’s own rendering of a verse or of a report and not the book’s own prose; so none of them follows the title, nothing was changed, and whether that English should follow the title stays with the author. At this Name they are the two āyāt, Abū Dāwūd 1495 and Muslim 592a on the Duʻāʼ page, at-Tirmidhī 3525 on the Ḥadīth page, the last line of the fourth stanza and two sentences of the meditation, and each of those last three is the verse or the supplication as this page prints it. What the reading did find, and leaves with the author, is that the meditation and the poem here argue from the English word generosity, which the title no longer carries; both are his pages and neither was touched.
IN BUILD 144, AFTER THE PHASE 2 READING OF NAME 5: Name 5 now cites Ibn Mājah 928 alone for the supplication, with Muslim 591 and 592a in its note, and the note under Muslim 592a here says so; the link between the two pages is unchanged. IN BUILD 145, BY THE AUTHOR’S DECISION (A14): the 55:78 note gives aṭ-Ṭabarī’s gloss, the One to whom honour belongs from all His creation, with Ibn ʻAbbās’s greatness and grandeur, and records that the six commentaries read at the pin at 55:27 and 55:78 divide on ikrām, owed to Him in aṭ-Ṭabarī and Ibn Kathīr, conferred in al-Baghawī and Ibn ʻĀshūr, both in al-Qurṭubī and as-Saʻdī, and chooses neither. The reading He deserves honour and confers it, struck at the first pass as resting on no source read, is borne out by al-Qurṭubī and as-Saʻdī, who give both. MEDS 85, POEMS 85, the title and the renderings are unchanged, by the same decision.
AFTER NAME 41, IN BUILD 165: the grade of the aliẓẓū pair gives at-Tirmidhī’s verdict at each record, gharīb and not maḥfūẓ at 3525 and gharīb at 3524, as Name 41’s does.