ShowHide the Study Notes (1,414 words)
CARRIED ON THIS PAGE: SIX ayat. 3:8, innaka anta l-wahhāb, with aṭ-Ṭabarī, al-Qurṭubī, Ibn ʻĀshūr and Abū Bakr’s recitation reported by Ibn Kathīr through ʻAbd ar-Razzāq from Mālik (corrected in build 149); 38:9, beside al-ʻAzīz, with aṭ-Ṭabarī and Ibn Kathīr; 38:35, Sulaymān’s petition, with Qatādah in aṭ-Ṭabarī, Ibn Kathīr and Ibn Ḥajar; 38:43, Ayyūb’s family, with aṭ-Ṭabarī, and al-Ḥasan and Qatādah in Ibn Kathīr — these at this Name only; 14:39, wahaba lī ʻalā l-kibar, SHARED WITH NAME 26, with aṭ-Ṭabarī; and, ADDED, 42:49–50, yahabu twice, with aṭ-Ṭabarī, Ibn Kathīr and al-Baghawī’s examples as Ibn Kathīr gives them, carried at this Name only. It is appended, sub-items 0 to 4 keep their positions, SHARED_LOCI needs no remap, and the distinct Qurʼan-page verse count in Notes on This Edition moves from 343 to 344.
NAMED HERE BUT NOT CARRIED ON THIS PAGE: 3:38 and 25:74, carried at NO Name, both standing on this Name’s supplication page, 3:38 also on Name 26’s; 19:5, 26:83, 37:100, 6:84, 19:49, 19:50, 19:53, 21:72, 21:90, 26:21, 29:27, 38:30, 19:19, 33:50, 38:34 and 38:36, all carried at NO Name.
CORRECTED ON THE RECORD, THE COUNTS: the entry gave none; computed from the Tanzil text, w-h-b gives twenty-five words in twenty-two verses — the Name three times, always definite; the imperative seven times, each a prayer to Allah; His giving thirteen times; li-ahaba at 19:19, the angel speaking; wahabat at 33:50, of a woman.
CORRECTED, THE ROOT: the gloss, to give freely without expectation of return, had glossBasis desc and no lexicon behind it. Ibn Fāris, read in a transcription at baheth.info, counts w-h-b as words not derived from one another; Ibn Manẓūr, read on the islamweb transcription of Lisān al-ʻArab, defines the hibah under the Name as the gift free of returns and aims. The gloss now follows Lisān, with glossBasis ref, and a senseNote is added.
CORRECTED, THE DESC: its contrast of Ar-Razzāq as the answering of need with Al-Wahhāb as the gift beyond need was unsourced and is contradicted by the commentators, who explain wahaba by razaqa at 14:39 (aṭ-Ṭabarī) and 42:49 (Ibn Kathīr), and by al-Ghazālī and al-Khaṭṭābī, whose accounts of the Name include what the needy need — healing, a child, guidance. The desc now gives the overlap and the difference, unnamed. Its claim that His gifts come needing no means at all had no source and is removed. The same contrast in Name 17’s desc, the gift beyond need, is changed to the gift that seeks no return, pending Name 17’s own pass. THE REF now gives the counts, Ibn Fāris, Lisān, al-Khaṭṭābī and al-Ghazālī — both read only as quoted in later works, al-Khaṭṭābī in aṣ-Ṣallābī’s articles citing a secondary compilation and al-Ghazālī at islamic-content.com citing al-Maqṣad al-Asnā p. 82 — and aṭ-Ṭabarī, al-Qurṭubī, Ibn ʻĀshūr and Ibn Kathīr, each read on the Arabic. Its phrase a kingdom no desert could secure is removed.
CORRECTED, THE QURʼAN NOTES: all five carried unattributed readings and now give the commentators; 14:39 said the sons came past the age for asking, when Ibrāhīm had asked (37:100), and now says in old age, with its translation. FOUR duʻāʼ. Qurʼan 3:8, carried at this Name only, its note now attributed.
ADDED: Abū Dāwūd 5061, from ʻĀʼishah, which names the Name, placed second as the first Prophetic supplication using it, graded ḍaʻīf by al-Albānī, ḥasan by Shuʻayb al-Arnaʼūṭ and isnād ḥasan by Darussalam in the dataset; and Qurʼan 3:38 and 25:74, with the Name’s verb only, the distance stated, each with aṭ-Ṭabarī and Ibn Kathīr, 3:38 SHARED WITH NAME 26 and 25:74 carried at no other Name (corrected in build 149). THREE tracked aḥādīth. al-Bukhārī 4808 with Muslim 541a, carried at this Name only, CORRECTED: its Arabic had commas and a colon, now removed; its grade now reads muttafaq ʻalayh; its note said Muslim 541a gives the petition in full, when Muslim adds the opening, forgive me, but not the close naming this Name, which the note now states; the chapter heading was confirmed in the islamweb text of Fatḥ al-Bārī, and the reading of the Prophet’s restraint is now attributed to Ibn Kathīr. at-Tirmidhī 3373, carried at this Name only, CORRECTED: its grade named Shuʻayb al-Arnaʼūṭ as grading ḍaʻīf at at-Tirmidhī, but the dataset records his ḍaʻīf at Ibn Mājah 3827 and records at at-Tirmidhī 3373 ḥasan from al-Albānī and Aḥmad Shākir and ḍaʻīf from Darussalam, which the grade now gives, with Ibn Mājah 3827 in the note; the citation of Ṣaḥīḥ al-Jāmiʻ 2418 could not be confirmed and is removed. Of the narrator judgments, Ibn Maʻīn’s weakening and Abū Zurʻah’s no harm in him were read only as cited by IslamQA answer 220871 from al-Jarḥ wa-t-Taʻdīl and Tahdhīb at-Tahdhīb; Ibn Ḥajar’s layyin, al-Ḥākim’s treatment of him as unknown and the claim that he is known from this report alone could not be confirmed and are removed. The note no longer carries the process remark confirmed as genuinely contested. Muslim 2577a, SHARED WITH NAMES 29, 88 AND 94 as other portions (Name 94 named in build 149), with source and grade unchanged and identical at all four Names; its note is tightened.
MEDS 16: hiba is spelled hibah; the contrast with provision is corrected as in the desc; the old stories become the Qurʼan’s accounts of the prophets, and kingdoms given past asking, when Sulaymān asked, becomes a kingdom given to the king who asked for it; the door offended by not being knocked on becomes the knock that displeases; the prophet taught no modesty becomes a prophet who asked largely, with the wind put at his command at 38:36.
POEMS 16: the opening violin in an orchestra repeated the orchestras of Names 11 and 98 and is replaced; this is not that, which set the gift outside provision, becomes this is more than that.
CH 16: the widow’s garden no longer grows past what any tending could explain, which sat against the ending, where every gift came out of the shoemaker’s shop.
GLOSSARY: Hibah added. AFTER THE CHAT-END AUDIT OF 81–85: the grade field of Abū Dāwūd 5061 now gives every grader in the dataset’s rows, each attributed to its record (the grade survey).
AFTER NAME 88: Name 88 carries another portion of Muslim 2577a, from all of you are hungry to the most wicked heart, linked both ways. AFTER THE 1–40 HYGIENE READING: the named line segment for 3:38 and 25:74 said carried on this Name’s supplication page and at NO Name’s Qurʼan page, which does not use the clause verifyN reads; it now says carried at NO Name, both standing on this Name’s supplication page, 3:38 also on Name 26’s. The duʻāʼ layer is not counted by the named line, which is why the claim is NO Name although both verses stand on supplication pages.
IN BUILD 149, FROM THE PHASE 2 READING: the duʻāʼ record above is corrected in place, Qurʼan 3:38 being Name 26’s second duʻāʼ as well, the same text, linked; the share line for Muslim 2577a names Names 29, 88 and 94, source and grade identical at all four. The note on at-Tirmidhī 3373 names the fourth grader of Ibn Mājah 3827, Muḥammad Fuʼād ʻAbd al-Bāqī, ḥasan, and gives the judgments on Abū Ṣāliḥ as later works give them, read only as IslamQA answer 220871 cites them. At 3:8 Ibn Kathīr gives Abū Bakr’s recitation through ʻAbd ar-Razzāq from Mālik and the night supplication from Abū Dāwūd, an-Nasāʼī and Ibn Mardawayh; the Muwaṭṭaʼ (1/79) and an-Nasāʼī’s al-Kubrā (10701) stand only in his editor’s notes, and the Qurʼan note, the duʻāʼ note and the carried line above now give his own routes.
FROM THE CENSUS: the report’s source field cites al-Bukhārī 4808 alone, the record that carries the printed Arabic, Muslim 541a standing in the note. The reflection’s two quotations wait on the author (A28).
BY THE AUTHOR’S DECISIONS OF 2026-09-25, IN BUILD 182: MEDS 16 quotes at-Tirmidhī 3373 and 38:35 in the book’s English, and its paraphrase of the prayer is kept (A28).
IN BUILD 207, FROM THE READING OF THE GRADES: Muḥammad Fuʼād ʻAbd al-Bāqī is no longer named as a grader on this page: the row the ḥadīth dataset gives in his name is al-Albānī’s ruling as it is printed with ʻAbd al-Bāqī’s edition of Ibn Mājah, read at Shamela through its page reader, not in print, and the edition gives no verdict of its own beyond quoting az-Zawāʼid; al-Albānī’s grade stands where it stood, and earlier records keep their words.