ShowHide the Study Notes (1,096 words)
CARRIED ON THIS PAGE: 4:79 and 4:166, kafā billāhi shahīdā; 22:17 and 58:6, the identical predication over all things; 5:117, shared with Name 43; 41:53, the sign-argument resting on the Witness; and six appended in this pass — 7:172, the witnessing Allah brings about and the answer shahidnā; 2:282, the two witnesses to a debt; 4:72, shahīd meaning present and nothing more; 6:73, ash-shahādah as the seen world; 85:7–9, the burners of the trench who are witnesses of their own act and Allah witness over all things two verses later; and 100:7, the last occurrence in the Book. None of the six was then carried at any other Name (85:8 is carried at Name 81 since its pass, as the record after Name 81 says: corrected in build 173), so no reciprocal quran links were needed, and the distinct verse count in Notes on This Edition moves from 439 to 445.
NAMED HERE BUT NOT CARRIED ON THIS PAGE: 4:41, 41:47, 50:21, 50:37, 18:51, 11:18, 40:51, 16:84, 16:89, 28:75, 4:159, 22:78 and 3:140, carried at NO Name; 2:143, carried at Name 83; 3:18, carried at Name 29 and Name 63 and Name 86; 85:14, carried at Name 34 and Name 47.
CORRECTED ON THE RECORD, THE COUNT: the root returns one hundred and sixty words and not one is a look-alike, the second root in a row of which that is true. The Name’s own adjective stands thirty-six times and only nineteen are of Allah (past dispute, with 100:7 a twentieth as most of the commentators read it: corrected in build 173); the definite ash-Shahīd is not said of Allah in the Qurʼan at all, which the entry said and the count confirms. Twice the word means present and nothing more. The noun ash-shahādah stands twelve times with the article (fourteen, with bi-sh-shahādah at 5:108 and li-sh-shahādah at 2:282: corrected in build 173) and most of those are not testimony but the seen world, in ʻālim al-ghayb wa-sh-shahādah. Shuhadāʼ stands twenty times and never of Allah. The page had six āyāt and every one of them was the same predication in the same words. FOUND / CORRECTED / REMOVED, AS UNVERIFIED: the ḥadīth page printed alam ublighi llāhumma fa-shhad and attributed it to Muslim 1218a. THAT SENTENCE IS NOT IN MUSLIM 1218a, and the words alam ublighu do not occur in any of the six editions at all; what the report carries is the crowd saying nashhadu annaka qad ballaghta wa-addayta wa-naṣaḥta and the Prophet ﷺ answering allāhumma-shhad, three times, with a gesture between the two clauses. The printed Arabic is replaced by the source’s own and joined by an ellipsis. This is not a splice of two stretches of one report but a sentence that was not in the report, which is a worse fault and is recorded as such. The ref also carried two citations against house form, Jāmiʻ at-Tirmidhī 3507 and Ṣaḥīḥ Muslim 1218a, and did not say the enumeration is graded ḍaʻīf.
READ: the six Arabic ḥadīth editions, searched for alam ublighu, for allāhumma-shhad and for alā hal ballaghtu, which is how the misattribution was found; Muslim 1218a and al-Bukhārī 831 letter by letter.
NOT READ: no lexicon was reached for sh-h-d this pass, and the entry’s glosses of the root rest on the Qurʼanic count alone, which is stated here rather than dressed up; the count is the evidence and nothing in the entry is attributed to a dictionary. Al-Ghazālī’s al-Maqṣad al-Asnā is still not reached in his own text.
OPEN: 100:7 is divided by the commentators over whose witness is meant, the man’s or Allah’s, and the division is recorded rather than settled. A lexicon pass on sh-h-d is owed: the desc’s claim that presence precedes testimony is carried here by the Qurʼanic usage at 4:72 and 50:37 and not by any dictionary, and it should be checked against one.
COHERENCE: 5:117 keeps its link to Name 43, where the same verse is read for ar-Raqīb. 6:73 closes on al-Ḥakīm and al-Khabīr, Names 46 and 31, and is carried at neither. 85:7–9 belongs to the sūrah Name 34 and Name 47 read at 85:14. 7:172 is the verse the tashahhud on this page repeats, and the Duʻāʼ note now says so. 58:6 is also printed at Name 57, which reads it for aḥṣāhu, the verb in the middle of the verse, and the two are linked in SHARED_LOCI.
AFTER NAME 81: Name 81 prints 85:8 alone, which this page prints within 85:7–9; linked both ways as another portion. AFTER THE CHAT-END AUDIT OF 1–99: the capitalised runs in the desc and the ref are set in lower case, the words unchanged.
IN BUILD 173, FROM THE PHASE 2 READING: the ref gives the nineteen as past dispute and names ʻĪsā’s own shahīd at 5:117 and 100:7 among the seventeen, most of the commentators reading 100:7 as Allah’s, counts ash-shahādah with the article fourteen times, sets and after the dash in lower case, and names Ibn Mājah 3861’s enumeration beside at-Tirmidhī 3507 (its rows: al-Albānī and ʻAbd al-Bāqī ṣaḥīḥ, al-Arnaʼūṭ ḥasan ṣaḥīḥ, Darussalam ḍaʻīf); the 4:79 note gives kafā billāhi shahīdā as one of the two frames the adjective of Allah takes most, ʻalā kulli shayʼin shahīd standing eight times against its seven, eight with 46:8; the 5:117 note gives ʻĪsā the verse’s own word, a witness while he was among them; the 58:6 note no longer says the ref names it with 22:17; the 7:172 note says in every prayer, the tashahhud being said at every sitting of two rakʻahs (an-Nasāʼī 1163); the 6:73 note counts fourteen, ten of them the formula; the 100:7 note gives the weight of the division, from al-Qurṭubī and al-Baghawī; the note on Muslim 1218a no longer narrates its editing, and gives the question the testimony answers and al-Bukhārī’s route from Abū Bakrah on the Day of Sacrifice; the carried line and the counts are corrected in place above.
IN BUILD 206, FROM THE BACKLOG READING OF THE GRADES: the rows the record of build 173 above gives the list are the dataset’s; the grades of Ibn Mājah’s list are read in the editions’ text at Shamela through its page reader, not in print: al-Albānī grades the report ṣaḥīḥ without the enumeration of the Names; Shuʻayb al-Arnaʼūṭ gives its isnād as ḍaʻīf with the Names, their naming an insertion by some narrators, the report without them standing in al-Bukhārī; Muḥammad Fuʼād ʻAbd al-Bāqī’s edition gives no verdict of its own and quotes az-Zawāʼid, that Ibn Mājah’s route is ḍaʻīf; Name 12 gives the editions’ verdicts.