ShowHide the Study Notes (1,609 words)
CARRIED ON THIS PAGE: 22:6, Allāhu huwa l-Ḥaqq bound in one sentence to the giving of life to the dead, shared with Name 60 and linked there; 10:32, which leaves no third category after the truth but error; 24:25, al-Ḥaqq al-Mubīn; and six appended in this pass, none of them then carried at any other Name (30:47 is carried at Name 81 since its pass, as the record after Name 81 says: corrected in build 174) — 10:30, the Name in the genitive as an attribute of mawlā; 24:49, where the same definite form is a claim in a lawsuit; 30:47, where Allah binds the obligation on Himself; 39:71, the verb bringing a sentence due; 69:1–3, al-Ḥāqqah, the Day named from this root; and 7:33, bi-ghayri l-ḥaqq, without right. The distinct verse count in Notes on This Edition moves from 445 to 451.
NAMED HERE BUT NOT CARRIED ON THIS PAGE: 6:62, carried at Name 40; 23:116, carried at Name 42; 22:62 and 31:30, carried at Name 36 and Name 37; 7:146, carried at Name 10; 41:15, carried at Name 53; 2:282, carried at Name 50; 2:61, 10:23, 28:39, 40:75, 42:42 and 46:20, carried at NO Name; 18:44, carried at Name 77; 7:30, 10:33, 10:96, 16:36, 17:16, 28:63, 32:13, 36:7, 37:31, 38:14, 39:19, 40:6, 41:25, 46:18 and 50:14, carried at NO Name; 22:18, carried at Name 85; 10:103 and 9:111, carried at NO Name; 7:105, carried at NO Name; 20:114, carried at Name 3 and Name 78; 16:38, carried at Name 49; 36:70, carried at Name 62; 23:71 and 38:84, carried at NO Name (named in build 174).
CORRECTED ON THE RECORD, THE COUNT: the root is geminate, so a stripped sweep for three radicals returns nothing (it returns ḥaqīq alone: corrected in build 174) and the count has to be taken on the pointed text. It gives two hundred and eighty-seven words. The definite form the Name takes stands one hundred and ninety-eight times (one hundred and ninety-four: the sweep had taken four words of l-ḥ-q, the fourth form alḥaqa, whose stripped letters carry al-ḥaqq, corrected in build 174) AND ONLY NINE ARE SAID OF ALLAH (past dispute, with 23:71 as most of the commentators read it and 38:84 as Mujāhid reads it: corrected in build 174); the page carried three of the nine and nothing else at all, so every other face of the root was missing from it. The commonest thing the root does in the Book is not name Allah: bi-ghayri l-ḥaqq, without right, stands nine times, al-ḥaqq is a debt owed between people at 2:282 and 24:49 (a debt at 2:282, a right in a dispute at 24:49: corrected in build 174), and the verb brings a sentence of punishment due at seventeen places (eighteen, with 36:70: corrected in build 174). Two words the sweep nearly loses are ḥaqīq at 7:105, where an alif stands between the second and third radicals (a yāʼ: corrected in build 174), and al-Ḥāqqah at 69:1–3, where one stands between the first and the second. FOUND / CORRECTED / REMOVED, AS UNVERIFIED: the Duʻāʼ page printed an excerpt BUILT OUT OF TWO RECENSIONS — the light clause from Muslim 769a and the long ḥaqq series from al-Bukhārī 1120 — and disclosed the seam in its own note instead of avoiding it. No such sentence exists in either source. Al-Bukhārī 1120 carries the whole of what was wanted on its own, so the Duʻāʼ page now prints 1120 unbroken and the Ḥadīth page prints Muslim 769a in its own words; the Ḥadīth page had been quoting four clauses of 1120, so the two entries had been giving one report twice. The ref carried a house-form citation, Ṣaḥīḥ al-Bukhārī 1120, and a bare Muslim 769 without the recension letter. The glossBasis was desc and the senseNote was empty; both are now written from the count and from Ibn Fāris.
READ: Ibn Fāris, Maqāyīs al-Lughah, the entry ḥ-q-q, IN HIS OWN TEXT and in both the unpointed and the pointed setting — one origin and no second, iḥkām ash-shayʼ wa-ṣiḥḥatuh, and al-ḥaqq the contrary of al-bāṭil in the same line; ḥaqqa sh-shayʼ meaning wajaba; ḥāqqa as the verb of two litigants; al-Ḥāqqah named because it makes everything come due, with 39:71 as his proof-text; al-ḥuqq, the socket where two bones meet, which he says is never anything but hard and strong; and 7:105 recorded read two ways. The Tanzil text, word by word, for all two hundred and eighty-seven occurrences. Al-Bukhārī 1120, 1166, 1496, 6099, 6382 and 7559 and Muslim 179a, 395a, 769a, 763g, 1631, 1827, 2581, 2655 and 2958a letter by letter.
NOT READ: ar-Rāghib, Lisān al-ʻArab and az-Zamakhsharī were not reached for this root, so nothing in the entry rests on them; al-Ghazālī’s al-Maqṣad al-Asnā is still not read in his own text.
OPEN: 18:44 is divided by the readings between lillāhi l-Ḥaqqi, an attribute of Allah, and al-walāyatu l-ḥaqqu, an attribute of the guardianship; no book of the qirāʼāt was read this pass, so the division is recorded and not settled, and the verse is not counted among the nine (the commentators at the pin name the readers — the genitive, of Allah, is the reading the book prints and most readers’, the nominative the reading of Abū ʻAmr and al-Kisāʼī — and aṭ-Ṭabarī prefers the genitive; the verse stays outside the nine past dispute: corrected in build 174). The whole verbal face of the root is carried at no Name and would make a good later page. The desc says that what is created holds its reality on loan; that is the book’s own reading of the count and of Ibn Fāris, and it is attributed to nobody.
COHERENCE: 22:6 keeps its link to Name 60. 10:30 repeats the clause of 6:62, which is at Name 40. 24:49 stands beside 2:282 at Name 50. 20:114 belongs to Name 3 and 23:116 to Name 42, where al-Maliku l-Ḥaqq qualifies the Name rather than standing alone; 22:62 and 31:30 are at Name 36 and Name 37 for the bāṭil clause (for their close, al-ʻAliyy al-Kabīr: corrected in build 174). The Duʻāʼ page keeps its link to Name 93, which reads Muslim 769a for the light rather than for the truth, and to Names 63 and 72, which carry other portions of al-Bukhārī 1120, linked both ways (recorded in build 174).
HYGIENE AFTER NAME 61: the Qurʼan note on 7:33 narrated the page’s own editing — standing nine times in the Book and carried nowhere before this page — and the clause is removed with the fact it carried kept.
AUDIT AFTER NAME 65: the Qurʼan link for 22:6 to Name 60 was of the kind the reader shows as Also at, which says the same text is printed there, and that page prints different Arabic; it is now shown as Another portion at.
AFTER NAME 77: 18:44 is now carried at Name 77 in the Ḥafṣ reading, walāyah; aṭ-Ṭabarī, read there, records walāyah and wilāyah and prefers wilāyah, and records al-ḥaqq read both as an attribute of Allah and otherwise (and prefers the genitive, of Allah: corrected in build 174). The division of the readings stays recorded and not settled.
AFTER NAME 81: Name 81 prints the whole of 30:47, which this page prints the close of; linked both ways as another portion.
AFTER NAME 85: one verse of the NAMED line, whomever Allah abases, is now carried at Name 85, and the line says so. AFTER THE CHAT-END AUDIT OF 1–99: the capitalised runs in the desc and the ref are set in lower case, the words unchanged.
IN BUILD 174, FROM THE PHASE 2 READING: the ref counts the definite form one hundred and ninety-four times, the four words of l-ḥ-q its sweep had taken set aside, and the other hundred and eighty-five; gives the nine as said of Allah past dispute and names 23:71, most of the commentators reading al-ḥaqq there as Allah, and 38:84, where Mujāhid has Allah say I am al-Ḥaqq, beside 18:44, whose readings it gives to their readers; counts the elative ten times, 10:53 being the question is it true, and four of them the word of a dispute; gives 24:49 as a right in a dispute; adds 36:70 to the sentences falling due and 16:38 to the promise binding upon Him; says the verb, not the root, most often brings a sentence due; says the three-radical sweep returns ḥaqīq alone; gives 39:71 as the verse Ibn Fāris quotes for al-Ḥāqqah; and calls the two entries two tellings of one prayer through Ṭāwūs. The senseNote gives the two-parties gloss to al-ḥiqāq, as Ibn Fāris gives it from Abū ʻUbayd (islamweb’s transcription of al-Maqāyīs, read on the web 2026-09-24, not pinned). The 22:6 note draws truth and resurrection together from the verse before, as the six commentators at the pin do; the 30:47 note names 16:38; the 39:71 note gives the entry’s two verses; the 7:33 note gives bi-ghayri l-ḥaqq as a phrase of nine, with illā bi-l-ḥaqq, al-ḥaqqu min rabbi- standing fourteen. The Duʻāʼ and Ḥadīth notes no longer narrate the page’s editing and carry facts from the editions in its place: the close of al-Bukhārī 1120 and Sufyān’s note on ʻAbd al-Karīm Abū Umayyah’s addition; the tellings of Ibn Jurayj and Ibn ʻUyaynah Muslim gives in 769b, and the close of 769a. The Duʻāʼ note says the word, not the Name, stands nine times. Muslim 769a is ṣaḥīḥ (muttafaq ʻalayh) at Names 63 and 93, as here. The carried line, the count, the named line, the OPEN item, the record after Name 77 and the coherence line are corrected in place above.