ShowHide the Study Notes (1,379 words)
CARRIED ON THIS PAGE: EVERY OCCURRENCE OF THE ROOT IN THE QURʼAN, eleven āyāt. Carried before: 19:94, where aḥṣāhum stands beside ʻaddahum ʻaddā; 72:28, closing Sūrat al-Jinn; and 18:49, the one place the verb is said of a book. Appended in this pass: 36:12 and 78:29, the other two places Allah is the subject in the plural of majesty, in a clear record and in writing; 58:6, SHARED WITH NAME 50 as an exact share, aḥṣāhu llāhu wa-nasūhu, one of Ibn Fāris’s two proof texts; 14:34 and 16:18, the favour of Allah that people cannot count through, printed together for their two endings; 73:20, lan tuḥṣūhu, the root’s second half and Ibn Fāris’s other proof text; 65:1, the root’s one command, count the waiting period; and 18:12, the two parties who reckoned the sleepers’ span. The distinct verse count in Notes on This Edition moves from 478 to 485.
NAMED HERE BUT NOT CARRIED ON THIS PAGE: 72:26–27, carried at Name 75, which prints 72:26.
CORRECTED ON THE RECORD, THE COUNT: the entry had none. The root is final-weak, so the sweep is ḥāʼ and ṣād with at most one letter between, on the Tanzil text: fifty-nine words, and forty-eight are look-alikes — ḥ-ṣ-n eighteen, ḥ-ṣ-d and ḥ-ṣ-r six each, ḥ-y-ṣ and ḥ-ṣ-b five each, ḥ-r-ṣ four, m-ḥ-ṣ two, ḥ-ṣ-l and ḥaṣḥaṣa one each. THE ROOT IS ELEVEN WORDS.
CLASSIFIED BY WHAT IT IS SAID OF: Allah five times, and every one is complete; the book once; people five times — commanded once, at 65:1, DENIED THREE TIMES, at 14:34, 16:18 and 73:20, and tested once, at 18:12. So nearly half the root is about people, and of that half most is the count they cannot finish. FOUR OF THE ELEVEN STAND BESIDE ʻ-D-D (five: at 65:1 the waiting period counted is al-ʻiddah, of ʻ-d-d, twice: corrected in build 179): at 19:94 and 72:28 His counting is completed; at 14:34 and 16:18 people may count, and the counting-through is denied them. No participle of the root stands in the Qurʼan, and the page’s occurrence field stays derived. The page had carried three of the eleven. FOUND / CORRECTED / REMOVED, AS UNVERIFIED: THE DESC DERIVED THE COUNTING FROM THE PEBBLES — from ḥaṣā, the pebbles the Arabs counted with. IBN FĀRIS, READ IN HIS OWN TEXT, GIVES THE ROOT THREE ORIGINS AND MAKES THE COUNTING AND THE PEBBLES TWO OF THEM: withholding, al-ḥaṣw; counting a thing and being equal to it, al-ʻadd wa-l-iṭāqah, with 73:20 and 58:6; and pebbles, al-ḥaṣā, from which he draws ḥaṣāh, intellect, because a pebble has firmness. He does not derive one from another, and no source read here says the Arabs counted with pebbles; the derivation is STRUCK AS CONTRADICTED by the only lexicon read. THE REF SAID Ḥ-Ṣ-Y GIVES ENUMERATION ONLY, WITH NO SECOND SENSE ATTACHED; Ibn Fāris puts being equal to a thing inside the counting origin itself, and the Qurʼan uses that sense at 73:20, where aṭ-Ṭabarī glosses lan tuḥṣūhu as lan tuṭīqūhu — so the claim is STRUCK AS FALSE, and the comparison with Name 40 now says only that the roots differ. MUSLIM 2677 IS IN THE DATASET. The ḥadīth note said it was not — no record of that number exists in the edition — and struck as unchecked the statement that Muslim’s own wording reads man ḥafiẓahā with man aḥṣāhā as Ibn Abī ʻUmar’s, and narrowed the grade. That search had asked for the bare number; the edition keeps Muslim’s sub-letters as decimals, the trap the toolkit records, and the records stand as 2677a and 2677b. 2677a says exactly what the struck statement said, which is now restored as checked, and 2677b carries the printed wording letter for letter, so the source is al-Bukhārī 2736 with Muslim 2677b and the grade is ṣaḥīḥ, muttafaq ʻalayh. Name 6 had cited Muslim 2677a correctly all along. THE 19:94 NOTE SAID ʻADDAHUM ʻADDĀ DOUBLES THE ROOT; it is a second root, ʻ-d-d. The ref carried Ṣaḥīḥ al-Bukhārī 2736, Ṣaḥīḥ Muslim 2677 and Jāmiʻ at-Tirmidhī 3507 against house form, and did not grade 3507. The Duʻāʼ and Ḥadīth notes carried production history.
IN THE MEDITATION: the banned phrase happened to, and the good a person does called unwitnessed and shown to no witness; rephrased so that nothing is called unwitnessed.
IN THE POEM: a fistful of sand holds something close to ten thousand grains. That is invented precision and wrong by more than an order of magnitude — a closed fist holds some tens of cubic centimetres, and beach sand of a quarter to half a millimetre gives several hundred thousand grains to a few million in that volume — so the line now says hundreds of thousands of grains, or more.
IN THE STORY: Marwan had knocked on ten thousand doors in a city of eleven thousand people, which would make a household of one; it now says more than two thousand doors.
READ: the Tanzil text for all fifty-nine returns, each in its verse. Ibn Fāris, Maqāyīs al-Lughah at ḥ-ṣ-w and ḥ-ṣ-y, IN HIS OWN TEXT, in the Shamela transcription of the Hārūn edition, volume two, the two pages the entry spans. Aṭ-Ṭabarī at 73:20 and 18:12; Ibn Kathīr at 36:12 and 73:20; as-Saʻdī at 14:34 and 73:20; Ibn ʻĀshūr at 18:12 and 73:20 — through the tafsir dataset. Letter by letter with their grade rows: al-Bukhārī 2736 and 7392, Muslim 2677a, 2677b and 2726a, Ibn Mājah 277 and 278, at-Tirmidhī 3506 and 3507; all six editions swept for the Name-form, which stands only in the list at at-Tirmidhī 3507.
NOT READ: ar-Rāghib, Lisān al-ʻArab and az-Zamakhsharī for this root; any grammarian on whether aḥṣā at 18:12 is verb or comparative, which is recorded as divided and not settled; al-Ghazālī’s al-Maqṣad al-Asnā, still not reached.
OPEN: the statement that no transmitted supplication addresses al-Muḥṣī rests on a sweep of the six editions for the Name-form and should go if one turns up. The Ibn Mājah 277 report is rendered in the sense aṭ-Ṭabarī gives the same verb at 73:20; no gloss on the report itself was read. The session_check claim that Muslim 2677 is absent from the dataset was true only of the bare number and has been replaced.
COHERENCE: 58:6 is now carried at Name 50 and at this Name with the same Arabic and English, linked both ways in SHARED_LOCI, and Name 50’s Study Note says so. Al-Bukhārī 7392’s gloss ties this Name’s verb to Name 38’s, ḥafiẓa. 78:29 stands two verses after ḥisāb, Name 40’s root, and its note says so. Name 6 already cites Muslim 2677a and is unchanged.
HYGIENE AFTER NAME 61: the Qurʼan note on 14:34 narrated the page’s own editing — The desc builds on this frame, and the page had not carried it — and the clause is removed with the fact it carried kept. AFTER THE CHAT-END AUDIT OF 1–99: the capitalised runs in the desc and the ref are set in lower case, the words unchanged.
IN BUILD 179, FROM THE PHASE 2 READING: the ref, the 19:94 note and the Duʻāʼ note count five of the eleven beside ʻ-d-d, 65:1 among them, and the 65:1 note says the ʻiddah counted is of that root; the 73:20 note makes it one of the three verses where the verb fails people; the note on the base report gives al-Bukhārī 2736 its own chain, through Shuʻayb from Abū z-Zinād, and Muslim 2677b its chain through Maʻmar. Muslim 486’s closing clause, lā uḥṣī thanāʼan ʻalayka, is printed on the Duʻāʼ page as at Name 78, with the same Arabic, English, source and grade, and linked both ways in SHARED_LOCI; the Duʻāʼ note names it and gives ʻadada khalqihi its root rather than a verb. The count line is corrected in place above.
IN BUILD 207, FROM THE READING OF THE GRADES: Muḥammad Fuʼād ʻAbd al-Bāqī is no longer named as a grader on this page: the row the ḥadīth dataset gives in his name is al-Albānī’s ruling as it is printed with ʻAbd al-Bāqī’s edition of Ibn Mājah, read at Shamela through its page reader, not in print, and the edition gives no verdict of its own beyond quoting az-Zawāʼid; al-Albānī’s grade stands where it stood, and earlier records keep their words.