ShowHide the Study Notes (1,534 words)
CARRIED ON THIS PAGE: fifteen āyāt. Carried before: 7:158, 3:156 and 15:23, the pairing of life and death. Appended in this pass, four SHARED as exact shares — 67:2 with Name 34, death created and named first; 39:42 with Name 20, the taking of the soul at death and in sleep; 2:258 with Name 60, the king’s claim to the verb; 32:11 with Name 52, the angel of death — and eight carried at no other Name: 56:60, death decreed among you; 4:78, death overtaking you in towers built high; 62:8, the death fled from that meets you; 53:44, the Name’s verb in the past tense and before its partner; 80:21–22, the one place the Name’s verb stands without the giving of life; 3:185, every soul tastes death; 44:56, no death in Paradise after the first; and 14:17, death from every side in the Fire and no dying. The distinct verse count in Notes on This Edition moves from 508 to 516.
NAMED HERE BUT NOT CARRIED ON THIS PAGE: 6:60–61, of the two only 6:61 carried at Name 15; 6:60, carried at NO Name; 2:259, carried at Name 49; 2:28 and 40:11, carried at Name 60; 25:58, carried at Name 62; 45:26, carried at Name 87; 61:8, carried at Name 93; 9:116, 10:56, 22:66, 23:80, 26:81, 30:40, 40:68, 44:8, 50:43, 57:2, 3:145, 62:6, 21:35, 29:57, 35:36 and 19:39, all carried at NO Name.
CORRECTED ON THE RECORD, THE COUNT: the entry had none, and the page’s governing claim was false. The 7:158 note, and the old Study Note after it, said yumīt occurs paired with yuḥyī in every verse where either appears. THE ROOT IS ONE HUNDRED AND SIXTY-FIVE WORDS, counted on the Tanzil text with a sweep of mīm, up to two weak letters and tāʼ, because the wāw of this hollow root turns to alif or yāʼ or drops, and amwāt puts two weak letters in the way; mutimmu nūrih at 61:8 is t-m-m and al-muʼtafikāt is ʼ-f-k, and both were read and set aside (nine in all, with amtā, ʼ-m-t, and seven the sweep takes because it reads past the hamzah — al-muʼtafikāt twice, al-muʼtafikah, al-muʼtūna, maʼtiyyā and miʼatayn twice: corrected in build 181). THE CAUSATIVE, THE NAME’S VERB, STANDS TWENTY-ONE TIMES, twenty of Allah and once the king’s claim at 2:258. IT SHARES ITS VERSE WITH THE CAUSATIVE OF LIFE EVERYWHERE BUT 80:21, where death is followed by burial and the raising comes in the next āyah with anshara.
IN THE OTHER DIRECTION THE CLAIM FAILS THIRTY-ONE TIMES: of the fifty-three uses of the causative of life counted at Name 60, thirty-one stand in verses with no death in them, among them both places the Name-form al-Muḥyī stands (thirty-one stand in verses without the causative of death; twenty-five of them carry another word of this root, the dead, a death or a dead land, both places of al-Muḥyī among them, and six carry none: corrected in build 181). The other forms: death, the noun, fifty-six times; dead, the adjective, forty-nine; to die, the simple verb, thirty-nine. The page had carried three āyāt, all the pairing, and nothing of death itself. FOUND / CORRECTED / REMOVED, AS UNVERIFIED: THE DUʻĀʼ NOTE ON AL-BUKHĀRĪ 5671 CALLED IT THE ONE TRANSMITTED SUPPLICATION THAT ADDRESSES AL-MUḤYĪ AND AL-MUMĪT BY THEIR OWN VERBS IN A SINGLE SENTENCE. Its second verb, tawaffanī, is w-f-y; the printed supplication carries no word of this root at all; and al-Bukhārī 6324, now on this page, does carry both roots — so the claim was false and the superlative with it. The same note carried a remark that the field had been left empty. THE ḤADĪTH SOURCE FIELD CARRIED THE NARRATOR, AND THE GRADE FIELD WAS NOT THE DATASET’S: it gave Darussalam as ḥasan, where the dataset gives isnād ḥasan, and said the report was raised to ḥasan ṣaḥīḥ or ṣaḥīḥ li-ghayrihi by later scholars via corroborating chains, which no source read here states; the dataset gives ḥasan ṣaḥīḥ for Aḥmad Shākir and al-Albānī and ḥasan for Bashshār ʻAwwād Maʻrūf, and the field now names all four with at-Tirmidhī’s own ḥasan gharīb. Its note said the ḥadīth literature rarely states the Name of Allah outright, a claim about the literature that nothing read measures, and pointed at the reflection for this Name; both struck. The ref carried Ṣaḥīḥ al-Bukhārī 6324 and Jāmiʻ at-Tirmidhī 3507 against house form. The old Study Note called its own reference record wholly wrong and then repeated the pairing claim; it is replaced. IBN FĀRIS, READ IN HIS OWN TEXT, GIVES ONE ORIGIN, the going of strength from a thing, proves it from the ḥadīth that tells those who must eat the foul plant to kill it by cooking, and records nāqah mumīt, a she-camel whose young die — the Name’s own form, said of a beast. MEDS 61, POEMS 61 and CH 61 were read and not changed; the poem’s leaf let go on a schedule the tree alone sets is left as figure — a deciduous tree forms the abscission layer in response to shortening days and cold.
READ: the Tanzil text for all six hundred and twenty-six returns, and every form of the root on the pointed text. Ibn Fāris, Maqāyīs al-Lughah at m-w-t, IN HIS OWN TEXT, in the islamweb copy, volume five, in both settings. Ibn Kathīr at 67:2, 3:156, 39:42, 32:11, 14:17, 53:44 and 62:8 (and at 4:78: corrected in build 181); aṭ-Ṭabarī at 56:60 and 80:21 (and at 4:78 and 44:56: corrected in build 181) — through the tafsir dataset. Letter by letter with their grade rows: al-Bukhārī 4730, 5671, 6324 and 6548; Muslim 2680a and 2849a; at-Tirmidhī 2307 and 3507; Ibn Mājah 3861; all six editions swept for the Name-form, which stands only in the two lists.
NOT READ: aṭ-Ṭabarī at 4:78 and 44:56, so those notes say what the verse says (both read at the pin, and the two notes give him: corrected in build 181); ar-Rāghib, Lisān al-ʻArab and az-Zamakhsharī; al-Ghazālī’s al-Maqṣad al-Asnā.
OPEN: the statement that no transmitted supplication addresses Allah as al-Mumīt rests on the sweep of the six editions for the Name-form (the page makes no such statement; the sweep, on the READ line, finds the Name-form only in the two lists: corrected in build 181). Who takes the soul — Allah at 39:42, the angel of death at 32:11 — is carried with Ibn Kathīr’s reconciliation and not argued further.
COHERENCE: 67:2, 39:42, 2:258 and 32:11 are now carried at this Name and at Names 34, 20, 60 and 52 with the same Arabic and English, linked both ways. Al-Bukhārī 6324 is now on the Duʻāʼ pages of Names 58, 59 and 61 with the same text, source and grade, linked; Name 59’s note says so. Name 60’s NAMED list said 53:44 was carried at no Name; it is repaired, and Name 60’s 2:258 note names this page. Muslim 2849a is now on this Ḥadīth page as a longer portion of the record Name 62 carries, with the same source and grade, linked both ways.
FOR NAME 62’S PASS: its English renders the one word khulūd first as everlasting life and then as everlasting existence, and opens by repeating O people of Paradise; recorded, not changed here (Name 62’s pass made its English match this page’s, as its Study Note records: corrected in build 181).
HYGIENE AFTER NAME 61: the Duʻāʼ note on al-Bukhārī 6324 said, The desc quotes the words for lying down — the desc says no such thing; STRUCK AS FALSE.
AFTER NAME 87: 45:26 is now carried at Name 87, and the NAMED line says so.
AFTER NAME 93: 61:8 is now carried at Name 93, and the named line says so.
AFTER NAME 97: 15:23 is now carried at Name 97 as well, in the same Arabic and English, and linked with this page as an exact share. AFTER THE CHAT-END AUDIT OF 1–99: the capitalised runs in the desc and the ref are set in lower case, the words unchanged.
IN BUILD 179, FROM THE PHASE 2 READING OF NAME 58: the ref’s pointer to the caveat on Ibn Mājah 3861’s list names Name 12, Al-Bāriʼ, whose Study Note records it; Name 13 carries none.
IN BUILD 181, FROM THE PHASE 2 READING: the ref names the nine near misses the pointed text sets aside, and gives the thirty-one causatives of life as standing without the causative of death, twenty-five of them beside another word of this root, as the 7:158 note now does; the 3:185 note says the āyah goes on to what comes after death, the first of the two others only after the trial by evil and good; the 39:42 note says what Name 20 reads the verse for; the 15:23 note names the share with Name 97; the 4:78 note gives Ibn Kathīr’s own reading of the verse and says where he pairs it with 62:8, and it and the 44:56 note give aṭ-Ṭabarī at the pin; the note on Muslim 2849a gives the report’s close and Abū Kurayb’s addition. The count, the named line, READ, NOT READ, OPEN and the line for Name 62’s pass are corrected in place above.