ShowHide the Study Notes (1,100 words)
CARRIED ON THIS PAGE: FIVE ayat. 3:26, SHARED WITH NAMES 22, 25 AND 84, with aṭ-Ṭabarī and Ibn Kathīr; 63:8, SHARED WITH NAME 8, with Ibn ʻAbbās, aṭ-Ṭabarī and Jābir; 35:10, SHARED WITH NAME 8 and, as another portion, with Name 23, with Mujāhid and aṭ-Ṭabarī; and, ADDED, 4:139, with aṭ-Ṭabarī, and 10:65, with Ibn Kathīr, both at this Name only. They are appended, sub-items 0 to 2 keep their positions, and the distinct Qurʼan-page verse count in Notes on This Edition moves from 357 to 359.
NAMED HERE BUT NOT CARRIED ON THIS PAGE: 37:180, carried at Name 8; 5:54, carried at Name 45; 9:128, carried at Name 83; 38:82, 2:206, 19:81, 26:44, 38:2, 11:92, 18:34, 27:34, 38:23 and 36:14, all carried at NO Name.
CORRECTED ON THE RECORD, THE COUNTS: the entry gave none; computed from the Tanzil text, the root gives 119 words, agreeing with Name 8, the verb of form IV stands once, at 3:26, and ʻizzah or ʻizz 12 times, 8 of them of Allah.
CORRECTED, THE ROOT: the gloss, might now given, had glossBasis desc and no source; it now follows Ibn Fāris and al-Jawharī as verified at Name 8, with glossBasis ref, and a senseNote is added. Lisān al-ʻArab and Ibn al-Athīr on al-Muʻizz were not read and are not cited.
CORRECTED, THE DESC: it said the honor He gives goes especially to those who live with sincerity and justice, and is not fame or wealth but a light in the heart and a standing in the heavens, which have no source and set aside the dominion aṭ-Ṭabarī reads in 3:26; it said no one can dishonor whom He honors without a source; it quoted 3:26 as the pair’s verse filing both under one word; it said the name-form comes from the enumeration with the Qurʼan giving the act; and it called Al-Mudhill its other hand, never read apart. It now gives the root and form, the reading of the verb, 63:8, the prayer, the weak list, 4:139, the report on pardoning, the neighbouring Names 25 and 8, and what the Name asks.
THE REF: Ṣaḥīḥ Muslim 2588 stood in a form the book does not use; honor reaching the Messenger and the believers only as something derived was an unsourced reading of 63:8; and never read apart overstated the pairing. The ref now gives the counts, the uses of ʻizzah, aʻazz and aʻizzah, at-Tirmidhī 3507 with its grades, ʻUmar’s saying, at-Tirmidhī 3681, Ibn Fāris and al-Jawharī, aṭ-Ṭabarī, Ibn Kathīr and Muslim 2588.
CORRECTED, THE QURʼAN NOTES: 3:26’s note called a prayer the place where honor is most honestly discussed; 63:8’s made the order of the list the argument; 35:10’s spoke of a supply not divided among sources; none cited anyone, and each now gives the commentators. TWO duʻāʼ. Qurʼan 3:26, SHARED WITH NAME 84 as another portion: its note is rewritten with Ibn Kathīr.
ADDED: at-Tirmidhī 3681, allāhumma aʻizza l-islām, the Name’s verb asked of Allah, carried at this Name only, with the dataset’s graders and Ibn Mājah 105 in the note. TWO tracked aḥādīth. Muslim 2588, SHARED WITH NAME 23 as another portion: its note’s three inversions is replaced by the chain and the statement that the report uses the noun, not the Name. al-Ḥākim, al-Mustadrak 207, CORRECTED: its grade said al-Ḥākim graded it ṣaḥīḥ on the criteria of al-Bukhārī and Muslim, and its note that adh-Dhahabī concurred and al-Albānī included it in aṣ-Ṣaḥīḥah; only al-Albānī’s verdict, ṣaḥīḥ on the criteria of the two Shaykhs in as-Silsilah aṣ-Ṣaḥīḥah, and the Arabic and number were read, on a secondary site quoting them, so the grade now gives that verdict as quoted in later works and the others are not asserted; its note’s all-capitals category note, the instruction for printed editions and the pointers to the reflection and to Name 25 are removed.
MEDS 24: the old question becomes the Qurʼan at 4:139 in the page’s translation; the Honorer, Al-ʻAzīz’s might now giving what He is, becomes the Bestower of Honor, since He does not give what He is; the chain honor travels down and honor not achieved but conferred by attachment, readings of 63:8 without a source, and no one alive holding the pen that could cross you out, a promise, become 35:10 and 63:8 in the page’s translations; honor not earned quietly, which sits against the report on pardoning, is removed; the tradition’s exchange rate becomes the Prophet ﷺ in a report from Abū Hurayrah in the page’s translation, and every pardon credited that same hour, a promise, is removed; a companion’s law becomes ʻUmar ibn al-Khaṭṭāb’s saying in the page’s translation; the close, honor held by attachment, becomes seeking honor where all of it is.
POEMS 24: the unearned sentence, which sits against the report tying honor to pardoning, becomes the one sentence.
CH 24: what none of them watched him do becomes what none of them noticed.
OPEN: al-Ḥākim’s own verdict on al-Mustadrak 207 and adh-Dhahabī’s were not read; a report that Allah will enter the word of Islam into every house with the honor of the honored, yuʻizzuhum llāh, given by al-Ḥākim at 8544 with a verdict read only on Dorar, was not added; Lisān al-ʻArab and Ibn al-Athīr on al-Muʻizz were not read.
AFTER NAME 82: Muslim 2588 is carried at Name 82 as well, with the same Arabic, English, source and grade, linked exactly. BY THE AUTHOR’S DECISION (A22), RECORDED IN BUILD 145: 35:10 is rendered honor here, the word this Name reads, and might at Name 8, which reads the verse for Al-ʻAzīz; both renderings stand, the Arabic linked exactly.
IN BUILD 152, FROM THE PHASE 2 READING: the ref names Ibn Mājah 3861’s list beside at-Tirmidhī 3507’s, and gives the Name’s verb as the Prophet ﷺ says it of Allah in both Ṣaḥīḥs, aʻazza jundahu, at al-Bukhārī 4114 and Muslim 2724, carried at Name 66, beside ʻUmar’s saying and the prayer at at-Tirmidhī 3681. The note on Ibn Mājah 105 gives its four graders, Muḥammad Fuʼād ʻAbd al-Bāqī’s ṣaḥīḥ among them. The note on Muslim 2588 names Name 82, which carries the whole report.
IN BUILD 207, FROM THE READING OF THE GRADES: Muḥammad Fuʼād ʻAbd al-Bāqī is no longer named as a grader on this page: the row the ḥadīth dataset gives in his name is al-Albānī’s ruling as it is printed with ʻAbd al-Bāqī’s edition of Ibn Mājah, read at Shamela through its page reader, not in print, and the edition gives no verdict of its own beyond quoting az-Zawāʼid; al-Albānī’s grade stands where it stood, and earlier records keep their words.