ShowHide the Study Notes (1,198 words)
CARRIED ON THIS PAGE: FOUR ayat. 59:24, al-Khāliqu l-Bāriʼu l-Muṣawwir, SHARED WITH NAMES 11 AND 13, its note now giving al-Qurṭubī, al-Baghawī, az-Zamakhsharī with Ibn ʻĀshūr, and al-Bayḍāwī; 2:54, where the Name stands twice, carried at this Name only, now quoted in full with Abū l-ʻĀliyah, Saʻīd ibn Jubayr and ar-Rabīʻ ibn Anas, Ibn Kathīr, al-Qurṭubī and Sufyān ibn ʻUyaynah; 57:22, min qabli an nabraʼahā, carried at this Name only, with aṭ-Ṭabarī, Ibn ʻAbbās, Qatādah and Ibn Kathīr; and, ADDED, 98:7, khayru l-bariyyah, with the reading of Nāfiʻ and Ibn Dhakwān, carried at this Name only. It is appended, the other sub-items keep their positions, and the distinct Qurʼan-page verse count in Notes on This Edition moves from 340 to 341.
NAMED HERE BUT NOT CARRIED ON THIS PAGE: 98:6, sharru l-bariyyah, and 57:23, both carried at NO Name.
CORRECTED ON THE RECORD, THE COUNTS: computed from the Tanzil text, the participle bāriʼ stands three times, once at 59:24 and twice at 2:54; b-r-ʼ gives twenty-nine words, or thirty-one counting al-bariyyah, which the Ḥafṣ text writes without hamza. The old figure of thirty-one in ten forms did not say that it counted al-bariyyah, and the number of forms depends on how they are divided, so it is no longer given.
CORRECTED, THE DESC AND ROOT: the desc said the root holds two senses that this Name keeps together; Ibn Fāris counts them as two roots, and the Name belongs to the first, which the desc, gloss and a new senseNote now say, with glossBasis ref. The desc called the triad’s division exact; the readings differ, and the desc now gives them unnamed. THE REF now gives Ibn Fāris, al-Qurṭubī, al-Baghawī, Ibn Kathīr, al-Ghazālī, al-Bayḍāwī, az-Zamakhsharī, Ibn al-ʻArabī, Ibn ʻAṭiyyah and al-Qāmūs, each read on the Arabic; al-Ghazālī, az-Zamakhsharī, Ibn al-ʻArabī, Ibn ʻAṭiyyah and al-Qāmūs only as quoted by Ibn ʻĀshūr, and al-Bayḍāwī through the islamweb transcription. CORRECTED, THE 2:54 NOTE: it named aṭ-Ṭabarī, Ibn Kathīr and al-Qurṭubī for one reading of the killing and called it a penalty particular to Banū Isrāʼīl; the commentators report more than one account, and the particular point is Sufyān ibn ʻUyaynah’s, in al-Qurṭubī, which the note now gives. THE 57:22 NOTE had called it the one verse setting this Name beside Name 11 and read the record as the decree; neither is in the commentators, and the note now gives their glosses. TWO duʻāʼ.
CORRECTED ON THE RECORD, THE ABSENCE: the entry said no transmitted supplication employs this Name, and that holds for the Name itself; but Ibn Khanbash’s refuge names its verb as Allah’s act, min sharri mā khalaqa wa-dharaʼa wa-baraʼa, and it is ADDED first, from Musnad Aḥmad 3/419 as al-Albānī cites it, graded ḥasan by him by the route of Sayyār ibn Ḥātim, with his judgment on the other routes stated. Its Arabic was read on Wikisource’s text of the Musnad, and al-Albānī’s ruling in the islamicurdubooks transcription of as-Silsilah aṣ-Ṣaḥīḥah; al-Bukhārī’s reservation is known here only through al-Albānī quoting Ibn Ḥajar, and the Musnad’s sequential number is not asserted. Abū Dāwūd 1516, from Ibn ʻUmar, SHARED WITH NAME 80 (corrected in build 147), CORRECTED: it had no grade; the dataset gives ṣaḥīḥ from al-Albānī and Zubair ʻAlī Zaʼī and ḥasan ṣaḥīḥ from Shuʻayb al-Arnaʼūṭ, now stated, and the note names Ibn Mājah 3814 and states the distance from the Name. BEYOND THE BOOK, the Name stands in the enumerated list of Ibn Mājah 3861, between al-Khāliq and al-Muṣawwir: Shuʻayb al-Arnaʼūṭ gives its isnād as ḍaʻīf with the list, the naming of the Names an insertion by some narrators, and Muḥammad Fuʼād ʻAbd al-Bāqī’s edition gives no verdict of its own and quotes az-Zawāʼid, that the route is ḍaʻīf; Darussalam grades it ḍaʻīf; al-Albānī grades the report ṣaḥīḥ without the enumeration of the Names, as a secondary source had said of him, citing his Ḍaʻīf Sunan Ibn Mājah 776. The list at at-Tirmidhī 3507 carries it too, with the mudraj caveat recorded at Name 6. The book builds on neither list. TWO tracked aḥādīth.
ADDED: Muslim 78, ʻAlī’s oath by the One who split the seed and baraʼa n-nasamah, with al-Bukhārī 3047, carried at this Name only.
CORRECTED: the report from Ibn Masʻūd, carried at this Name only, had composite Arabic, part al-Bukhārī 3208 and part Muslim 2643a; it now quotes Muslim 2643a exactly, with al-Bukhārī’s differences in the note, and the note no longer asserts that the report describes this Name’s work rather than Al-Khāliq’s; it states that the root is absent, and that al-Qurṭubī cites the same stages for taṣwīr.
MEDS 12: its account of the two senses as held together by the Name is corrected to two roots heard together; the triad reading is marked as one reading; the claim that 2:54 demanded the severest repentance any people were asked to make is removed; the refuge of Ibn Khanbash is acknowledged; and the hundred-times count is attributed to Ibn ʻUmar.
CH 12: springs are thrown out rather than melted, which is not how a clockmaker disposes of a bad spring.
POEMS 12: a split stone is no longer said never to turn out hollow, which geodes contradict.
OPEN: CH 12 and POEMS 12 both turn on the interior made as true as the surface; the overlap is left for the author (closed by the author’s decision, A26: both pages are kept, and the poem opens Split a stone and the inside is no counterfeit, from build 182).
AUDIT, FINAL CHECK OF NAMES 1 TO 25: MEDS 12’s hole in the tradition becomes a gap in the Sunnah.
AFTER NAME 80: the grade of Abū Dāwūd 1516 omitted Muḥammad Muḥyī ad-Dīn ʻAbd al-Ḥamīd, whose row is ṣaḥīḥ; now given, and the supplication is shared exactly with Name 80.
IN BUILD 147, FROM THE PHASE 2 READING: the duʻāʼ line above is corrected in place, Abū Dāwūd 1516 being shared with Name 80; the line beyond the book gives Ibn Mājah 3861’s four rows.
FROM THE CENSUS: the report’s source field cites Muslim 2643a alone, the record that carries the printed Arabic, al-Bukhārī 3208 standing in the note. The overlap of the story and the poem, and the poem’s opening, wait on the author (A26).
BY THE AUTHOR’S DECISIONS OF 2026-09-25, IN BUILD 182: POEMS 12 opens Split a stone and the inside is no counterfeit; CH 12 and POEMS 12 are both kept, and the OPEN item is closed in place (A26).
IN BUILD 206, FROM THE BACKLOG READING OF THE GRADES: the grades of Ibn Mājah’s list are read in the editions’ text at Shamela through its page reader, not in print: al-Albānī grades the report ṣaḥīḥ without the enumeration of the Names; Shuʻayb al-Arnaʼūṭ gives its isnād as ḍaʻīf with the Names, their naming an insertion by some narrators, the report without them standing in al-Bukhārī; Muḥammad Fuʼād ʻAbd al-Bāqī’s edition gives no verdict of its own and quotes az-Zawāʼid, that Ibn Mājah’s route is ḍaʻīf; the line beyond the book above now gives them, the secondary source’s reading of al-Albānī confirmed in his own entry; his Ḍaʻīf Sunan Ibn Mājah and al-Mishkāt, which the entry cites, are not read, nor the three in print.