ShowHide the Study Notes (1,616 words)
CARRIED ON THIS PAGE: EIGHT ayat. Carried before and now with named commentators: 42:23, the increase placed inside the deed; 35:30, with aṭ-Ṭabarī and Qatādah, who divide the pair between the two halves of a record; 35:34, the only one of the four spoken by servants; 64:17, SHARED WITH NAME 32 in its pairing though not in its page; 14:7, the servant’s side of the Name.
ADDED: 34:13, WHICH CARRIES THE ONLY DEFINITE ASH-SHAKŪR IN THE QURʼAN AND DOES NOT SAY IT OF ALLAH — it is said of human beings, and as a complaint that they are few; 2:158, WHERE THE ROOT IS PREDICATED OF ALLAH IN ITS OTHER FORM, shākir, which the entry did not know about at all; and 17:3, THE ONE PERSON THE QURʼAN NAMES SHAKŪR, Nūḥ. All three are appended, the five existing sub-items keep their positions, and the distinct Qurʼan-page verse count in Notes on This Edition moves from 384 to 387.
NAMED HERE BUT NOT CARRIED ON THIS PAGE: 4:40, carried at Name 86; 14:5, 31:31, 34:19, 42:33, 4:147, 17:19, 76:22 and 35:29, all carried at NO Name.
CORRECTED ON THE RECORD, THE COUNTS: computed from the Tanzil text with strip, sh-k-r gives SEVENTY-FIVE words in SIXTY-NINE verses, and a widened pattern returns nothing further, so this root has no look-alikes at all, as at Names 29, 31 and 34 (corrected in build 159). THE ENTRY SAID THE NAME OCCURS FOUR TIMES AND THAT IS RIGHT AS FAR AS IT GOES, but it goes only as far as one form. The adjective shakūr stands TEN times. FOUR are of Allah — 35:30, 35:34, 42:23 and 64:17, which are the four the entry knew.
SIX ARE OF CREATURES: the ṣabbār shakūr, every patient and grateful one, at 14:5, 31:31, 34:19 and 42:33; Nūḥ at 17:3; and 34:13. AND THE ONE DEFINITE OCCURRENCE, ASH-SHAKŪR WITH THE ARTICLE, IS 34:13, WHERE IT IS NOT SAID OF ALLAH BUT OF SERVANTS AND IS A COMPLAINT THAT THEY ARE FEW — the same shape as the definite al-Ḥalīm at Name 32, which is likewise said of a creature and not of Allah.
BEYOND THAT, THE ROOT IS PREDICATED OF ALLAH IN A SECOND FORM THE ENTRY NEVER MENTIONED: the active participle shākir, at 2:158 and 4:147, so that the root is said of Allah SIX times and not four. The passive stands twice, mashkūr at 17:19 and 76:22, where it is the servants’ own striving that is thanked.
CORRECTED, THE ROOT: glossBasis was desc and senseNote was null. IBN FĀRIS GIVES FOUR ROOTS AND CALLS THEM DIVERGENT AND FAR FROM ANALOGY, which is the same judgement he passes on ḥ-l-m at Name 32: the first is praise of a person for a kindness he does you, and under it Ibn Fāris records that THE REALITY OF SHUKR IS CONTENTMENT WITH THE LITTLE; the second is fullness and abundance in a thing; the third is the shakīr, the shoot that grows from the trunk of a tree; the fourth is marriage. The gloss now follows him with glossBasis ref, and a senseNote is written.
READ: Ibn Fāris as three independent transcriptions give the Maqāyīs entry, all in the same wording; NOT in a printed edition and NOT on the aggregator page, which did not surface. NOT READ for this root: Lisān al-ʻArab, ar-Rāghib al-Iṣfahānī, al-Jawharī, Ibn al-Athīr and al-Fayyūmī, and nothing is claimed from them.
CORRECTED, THE DESC, AND THIS IS A REMOVAL RATHER THAN A REPLACEMENT: it said twice, once in the desc and once in the ref, that the Arabs called an animal shakūr if it thrived on little fodder, a handful of feed showing in its whole frame. THE CLAIM WAS NOT FOUND IN ANY LEXICON READ THAT PASS, and was set under Ibn Fāris’s second root, fullness and abundance; it is his, under the first, straight after contentment with the little: a horse is shakūr when a little fodder fattens it (corrected in build 159, on his text). Both occurrences are removed, and Ibn Fāris’s own line about contentment with the little takes the place of the one in the desc — which says the same thing and has a name behind it.
CORRECTED, THE REF: IT CARRIED THREE LONG CITATION FORMS — Sunan Abī Dāwūd 1522, Ṣaḥīḥ al-Bukhārī 1410 and Ṣaḥīḥ Muslim 1014a — all of which the house forms forbid; it named no lexicon and no commentator; it gave no count beyond the four; and it did not carry at-Tirmidhī 3507 with its grades. All are fixed.
CORRECTED, THE QURʼAN NOTES: none of the five carried a named commentator. ONE duʻāʼ, and IT HAD NO GRADE. It has one now, gathered from the dataset at both of its citations: ṣaḥīḥ from al-Albānī, from Shuʻayb al-Arnaʼūṭ, from Muḥammad Muḥyī ad-Dīn ʻAbd al-Ḥamīd and from Abū Ghuddah, with Darussalam giving isnād ṣaḥīḥ at Abū Dāwūd 1522 and ṣaḥīḥ at an-Nasāʼī 1303.
EVERY CLAIM IN ITS NOTE WAS CHECKED AND ALL OF THEM HOLD: an-Nasāʼī 1303 does read rabbi where Abū Dāwūd reads allāhumma, does set the words in every prayer, and does carry Muʻādh’s answering declaration. A thing the note could not have known is added: the chain at an-Nasāʼī runs through Abū ʻAbd ar-Raḥmān al-Ḥubulī, who is also the man aṭ-Ṭabarī cites at 34:13, on this page, saying that the best of thanks is praise. FIVE aḥādīth, all verified against the dataset. TWO SOURCE FIELDS HELD ESSAYS. al-Bukhārī 1410’s ran to some hundred and thirty words comparing two recensions and was by a distance the longest in the second half of the book; the source now reads Muslim 1014a; al-Bukhārī 1410, in that order because the printed wording is Muslim’s, and the grade a plain ṣaḥīḥ (muttafaq ʻalayh).
EVERY CLAIM IN THAT ESSAY HOLDS: Muslim 1014a carries the printed string word for word and continues with the colt comparison, and al-Bukhārī 1410 is the other recension, closing mithla l-jabal where Muslim closes aʻẓama min al-jabal. al-Bukhārī 1417’s source field also held an essay and now reads al-Bukhārī 1417; Muslim 1016c, with the continuation moved into the note.
CORRECTED, A NOTE THAT SAID SOMETHING THE BOOK FORBIDS: the note at al-Bukhārī 652 called the removing of the branch an act with no witness. IT HAD A WITNESS, and the report is about nothing else — Allah thanked him for it. The sentence is rewritten. A long citation form in the note at Muslim 2626, Jāmiʻ at-Tirmidhī 1956, is shortened to the house form. MEDS 35, POEMS 35 and CH 35 read and unchanged.
OPEN: the shakūr horse is found in Ibn Fāris and stands again in the ref; whether the desc, at 133 of its 138 words, takes it back is the author’s.
OPEN: Ibn Fāris is read in his own text on baheth’s transcription of al-Maqāyīs and as two sites quote it, and not yet in print; no other lexicon was read.
COHERENCE: Name 32 carries 64:17 in its own count of the pairings and this page now names it the same way; neither page is changed by the other. Name 34, whose Name stands beside this one in three of the four divine occurrences, now agrees with this page on the count of three (corrected in build 159): this page states it from the shakūr side and Name 34 from the ghafūr side, and the two counts were taken independently.
HYGIENE AFTER NAME 61: the Qurʼan note on 2:158 narrated the page’s own editing — which stands twice, here and at 4:147, and which the entry had never named — and the clause is removed with the fact it carried kept. AFTER THE CHAT-END AUDIT OF 81–85: the grade field of Abū Dāwūd 1522; an-Nasāʼī 1303 now gives every grader in the dataset’s rows, each attributed to its record (the grade survey).
IN BUILD 159, FROM THE PHASE 2 READING: the 42:23, 35:34 and 14:7 notes give aṭ-Ṭabarī’s readings as his entries have them — the good deed any act of obedience, the division over the clause before; every kind of grief taken together; the favours increased and the obedience reading rejected, the broken parallel the note’s own observation. The ḥadīth notes cite al-Bukhārī 2989 and Muslim 35b for the related reports and al-Bukhārī 3467 and Muslim 2245b for the woman of Banī Isrāʼīl; the three source fields cite the one record that carries each printed wording — Abū Dāwūd 1522, Muslim 1014a and Muslim 2244 — with the others in their notes, and the duʻāʼ’s grade gives Abū Dāwūd 1522’s graders, an-Nasāʼī 1303’s in its note. The ref names Ibn Mājah 3861’s list and carries again Ibn Fāris’s shakūr horse, found under his first root on baheth’s transcription of al-Maqāyīs; the 17:3 note counts two verses from the night journey. The record on the counts and the COHERENCE remark agree with Names 29, 31 and 34, the judgement on ḥ-l-m no longer claims almost no other root, and the OPEN items say where Ibn Fāris was read and leave the desc’s wording to the author. The reflection’s multiples wait on the author (A47).
BY THE AUTHOR’S DECISIONS OF 2026-09-25, IN BUILD 182: MEDS 35 gives the multiples as many multiples beyond that (A47).
IN BUILD 195, FROM THE BACKLOG READING OF THE LEXICA: Ibn Fāris at sh-k-r is read at Shamela through its page reader, not in print, vol. 3, pp. 207–208, and every claim this page makes of him holds: four roots, mutabāyinah baʻīdat al-qiyās; the first, praise of a person for a kindness he does you; wa-yuqālu inna ḥaqīqata sh-shukr ar-riḍā bi-l-yasīr; the shakūr horse under the first root; fullness, the shoot from the trunk and marriage the other three; the print itself is still owed.