ShowHide the Study Notes (1,674 words)
CARRIED ON THIS PAGE: SIX ayat. Carried before and now with named commentators: 2:255, SHARED WITH NAMES 36, 38, 62 AND 63 (38 named in build 157), the closing pair of Āyat al-Kursī; 56:74, the verse the bowing takes its words from; 69:33, where refusal is put as a failure of proportion.
ADDED: 42:4, THE ONLY OTHER PLACE AL-ʻALĪ AL-ʻAẒĪM STANDS, which the ref named and the page did not carry; 9:129, WHERE AL-ʻAẒĪM DESCRIBES THE THRONE AND NOT ALLAH, readable from the kasrah in the printed text; and 15:87, WHERE IT DESCRIBES THE QURʼAN. All three are appended, the three existing sub-items keep their positions, and the distinct Qurʼan-page verse count in Notes on This Edition moves from 378 to 381.
NAMED HERE BUT NOT CARRIED ON THIS PAGE: 23:14, 56:96, 69:52, 23:86 and 27:26, all carried at NO Name; 87:1, carried at Name 36.
CORRECTED ON THE RECORD, THE COUNTS: computed from the Tanzil text with strip, ʻ-ẓ-m gives ONE HUNDRED AND TWENTY-EIGHT words in ONE HUNDRED AND TWENTY-SEVEN verses, 23:14 carrying two. The only look-alikes a widened pattern returns are yaʻiẓukum, waʻẓihim and aʻiẓukum, all from w-ʻ-ẓ, and all excluded. THE ADJECTIVE STANDS ONE HUNDRED AND SEVEN TIMES, and this is the fact the entry did not have: ʻaẓīm forty-nine times, ʻaẓīman twenty-two, and the definite al-ʻaẓīm thirty-six. NOT ONE OF THE SEVENTY-ONE INDEFINITE OCCURRENCES IS SAID OF ALLAH — they are said of a punishment, a reward, a day, a wrong, a trial — AND OF THE THIRTY-SIX DEFINITE ONES ONLY SIX ARE: al-ʻAlī al-ʻAẓīm at 2:255 and 42:4; rabbika l-ʻaẓīm at 56:74, 56:96 and 69:52; and bi-llāhi l-ʻaẓīm at 69:33. The other thirty go to al-fawz thirteen times, to dhū l-faḍl six, to al-ʻarsh three, to al-karb three, and once each to al-Qurʼān, al-khizy, aṭ-ṭawd, al-ḥinth and an-nabaʼ. SO THE NAME’S OWN WORD IS USED OF THINGS OTHER THAN ALLAH ABOUT SEVENTEEN TIMES FOR EVERY ONCE IT IS USED OF HIM, which is the reverse of al-Khabīr at Name 31 and is the entry’s best argument, since what is being called great in all those places is a thing measured against Him (corrected in build 157). Two of the six are inside Sūrat al-Ḥāqqah, which charges a man with not believing in Allah al-ʻAẓīm at 69:33 and closes at 69:52 by commanding that the name of the Lord al-ʻAẓīm be glorified.
CORRECTED, THE ROOT: the gloss was the desc’s own phrasing and followed no lexicon, and senseNote was null. IBN FĀRIS GIVES ONE SOUND ROOT AND IT IS NOT SIZE ALONE: largeness and strength, kibar wa-quwwah. The gloss now follows him with glossBasis ref, and a senseNote is written.
CORRECTED, THE DESC, AND THIS IS WHAT THE PASS CAME FOR: it said the same letters give ʻaẓm, bone, as if the language itself understood that true greatness is structural, what everything else rests on. THAT IS AN INVENTED ETYMOLOGY. Al-Khalīl, in al-ʻAyn, gives al-ʻiẓām as the plural of al-ʻaẓm and defines it as the shafts of the joints; Ibn Fāris files the bone under largeness and strength, and beside it ʻaẓmat adh-dhirāʻ, the thick part of the forearm. The relation the lexicons record is bulk, not structure, and nothing in them says the bone is what anything rests on. The sentence is removed and the lexicons put in its place. The desc’s other claim, that the magnificence is not spatial, IS RIGHT AND NOW HAS A LEXICON BEHIND IT: Lisān al-ʻArab says that al-ʻiẓam in the description of bodies is largeness of length and breadth and depth, and that Allah is exalted above that. READ, on the Hawramani aggregator and in the Lisān transcription: Ibn Fāris, al-Khalīl, Lisān al-ʻArab, and Ibn al-Athīr and al-Azharī as Lisān and the Tahdhīb are quoted there. Ibn al-Athīr gives the Name: the One whose measure has passed beyond the bounds of intellects, so that encompassing His inmost reality cannot be conceived. Al-Azharī: the ʻaẓamah of Allah is not given a modality, nor bounded, nor likened to anything, and the servants must know that He is ʻaẓīm as He described Himself and beyond that. NOT READ in a printed edition; all of it in transcription. NOT READ at all for this root: al-Jawharī, ar-Rāghib al-Iṣfahānī, al-Fayyūmī and az-Zabīdī, and nothing is claimed from them.
CORRECTED, THE REF: IT CARRIED THREE WRONG CITATION FORMS — Jāmiʻ at-Tirmidhī 262, which the house forms forbid, and Abī Dāwūd twice for Abū Dāwūd; it gave no count of the root; it named no lexicon and no commentator; it named 42:4 while the page carried it at no Name; and it did not carry at-Tirmidhī 3507 with its grades. All are fixed.
CORRECTED, THE QURʼAN NOTES: none of the three carried a named commentator. ONE duʻāʼ BECOMES TWO. THE FIRST HAD AN ESSAY IN ITS GRADE FIELD — some thirty words distributing two verdicts across two collections — AND A SOURCE THAT NAMED A BOOK WHOSE WORDING IT DOES NOT PRINT. Abū Dāwūd 869 was read against the dataset: it is the ʻUqbah ibn ʻĀmir report instructing that the verse be used in bowing, and IT DOES NOT CONTAIN THESE WORDS AT ALL, so it is out of the source field and into the note. The source now reads at-Tirmidhī 262 alone, whose Ḥudhayfah wording is what the page prints, and the grade gathers every verdict the dataset gives rather than two of them: ḥasan ṣaḥīḥ from at-Tirmidhī himself and from Bashshār ʻAwwād Maʻrūf, and ṣaḥīḥ from al-Albānī, from Aḥmad Shākir and from Darussalam. THE BOOK HAD RECORDED ONLY TWO OF THE FIVE, and had recorded for Abū Dāwūd 869 only al-Albānī’s ḍaʻīf, where the dataset adds Muḥammad Muḥyī ad-Dīn ʻAbd al-Ḥamīd, also ḍaʻīf, and Darussalam, who calls its chain ṣaḥīḥ. The note now says so. ADDED, A SECOND duʻāʼ: the duʻāʼ of distress, SHARED WITH NAME 32 and keyed reciprocally, WHICH IS ONE OF THE TRANSMITTED SUPPLICATIONS THAT NAME THIS NAME IN THE DEFINITE FORM (corrected in build 157), and the page had it at no Name of its own though Name 32 carried it. Its Arabic, English, source and grade are Name 32’s exactly; only the note differs. TWO aḥādīth, both verified against the dataset and both with their grades completed. Abū Dāwūd 4727 read ṣaḥīḥ by al-Albānī only; the dataset adds Muḥammad Muḥyī ad-Dīn ʻAbd al-Ḥamīd, ṣaḥīḥ, and Darussalam, isnād ṣaḥīḥ. al-Bukhārī 6682 with Muslim 2694 was confirmed word for word, and Muslim’s record carries no letter after the number, so the bare form is right.
MEDS 33: TWO QUOTATIONS THAT DID NOT MATCH THE BOOK’S OWN TRANSLATIONS — 2:255 and al-Bukhārī 6682 — and both now do; the second had turned kalimatān into two words where the page renders it two phrases.
POEMS 33 CORRECTED, AND THIS IS A MATTER OF FACT AND NOT OF STYLE: its first two stanzas said that some of what you see on a clear night is not there any more, the star having burned out centuries ago. THAT IS NOT TRUE OF THE STARS THE UNAIDED EYE CAN SEE. They lie within a few thousand light-years and all but a vanishing few are still burning; the belief is a common one and astronomers correct it. What is true is the part the poem actually needs, that nothing seen is seen as it now is, and the stanzas are rewritten to say that instead. CH 33 read and unchanged, and its own astronomy, that the light landing on the navigator’s face left before her grandmother was born, is sound.
OPEN: no lexicon was read in a printed edition.
OPEN: the identification of Darussalam with Zubayr ʻAlī Zaʼī for at-Tirmidhī and with the chain verdicts for Abū Dāwūd follows the dataset’s own grade rows and is not independently checked.
COHERENCE: Name 32 gains a reciprocal duʻāʼ link and no change of text; its copy of the duʻāʼ of distress already carries the source and grade strings this page now uses. Name 36, whose duʻāʼ note also records Abū Dāwūd 869 as ḍaʻīf by al-Albānī, agrees with what this page now says and is left as it stands, and its note now spells the citation in the house form (corrected in build 157).
IN BUILD 156, WITH NAME 32: the duʻāʼ of distress is cited Muslim 2730a; al-Bukhārī 6346, the route of al-Bukhārī that carries the three declarations word for word, where 6345 has the shorter two-part form; the note says so without numbers. One record keeps one source wherever it is carried, so the change made at Name 32 is made here; the rest of this page waits on its Phase 2 reading.
IN BUILD 157, FROM THE PHASE 2 READING: the desc and the record on the counts no longer make everything called great a thing He made, the Book being among them; each says it is measured against Him. The duʻāʼ of distress is one of the transmitted supplications that name the Name in the definite form, with Abū Dāwūd 3106 and 466 and at-Tirmidhī 2083 and 3577 beside it. The 69:33 note gives aṭ-Ṭabarī’s reading, requital for disbelief after the verses before it, and the 2:255, 56:74, 9:129 and 15:87 notes give his and Ibn Kathīr’s words as they stand at the pinned text; the ref sets 34:23’s and 13:9’s pairs beside 2:255 as Ibn Kathīr does and names Muslim 772 and Ibn Mājah 3861’s list. The 2:255 note and the carried line name Name 38; the 42:4 note, the first duʻāʼ note and the ḥadīth notes no longer narrate the page’s editing; the COHERENCE remark on Name 36 is brought up to date. The reflection’s bow waits on the author (A44).
BY THE AUTHOR’S DECISIONS OF 2026-09-25, IN BUILD 182: MEDS 33 places the words at the bow of the prayer and gives them in the page’s English (A44); 2:255 reads His Kursi extends over the heavens and the earth, and their preservation does not weary Him: preservation is Name 38’s own noun, which Names 36 and 38 give too, and MEDS 33 quotes it so (A23).