ShowHide the Study Notes (3,663 words)
124 OK, PROMISE-CHECKER PASS.
APPENDED: 2:102, the FIRST of the two places the participle ḍārr stands. The description names the PAIR — of magic and of secret counsel — and the page carried only 58:10, the second. Half a pair shown is the fault this pass exists to find. Printed from the longer āyah; the sentence denies the magic any power of its own. Both occurrences say the same thing in the same shape: the harm is real, the harming is not the harmer’s — which carries more weight here than elsewhere because THE NAME ITSELF IS NEVER SAID OF ALLAH IN THE QURʼAN. Quran.com consulted 18 September 2026. THE FIRST PASS RECORD FOLLOWS.
CARRIED ON THIS PAGE: eleven entries, six before and five appended. Before: 6:17, shared identically with Name 92; 5:76; 48:11, shared identically with Name 92; 21:83; 12:87; and 21:69, their Arabic and English unchanged. Appended, all new to the book: 10:107, whose first clause is that of 6:17; 36:23, ar-Raḥmān the one who intends adversity; 39:38 from qul a-fa-raʼaytum to mumsikātu raḥmatih, His adversity set against His mercy; 21:84, the answer to Ayyūb; and 58:10, the root’s participle, harming no one except by Allah’s leave. 12:87 and 21:69 carry no word of the root, and their notes say so. The occurrence field stays derived: the Name-form is not in the Qurʼan, and Allah is the one who touches, intends and removes in the root’s verbs.
NAMED HERE BUT NOT CARRIED ON THIS PAGE: 35:2, carried at Name 18 and Name 90; 3:144, carried at Name 56; 10:49, carried at Name 71 and Name 72; 7:188 and 10:106, carried at Name 92; 6:42, 7:94, 2:126, 31:24, 10:12, 16:54, 23:75, 27:62, 12:88, 72:21, 47:32, 5:75, 21:68 and 36:20, all carried at NO Name.
CORRECTED ON THE RECORD, THE COUNT: ḍ-r-r counted on the pointed Tanzil text (count_drr.py; asserted in build_N91.py). The sweep of ḍād then rāʼ with up to two letters between returns 178 words: 104 look-alikes — ḍ-r-b 58, ḥ-ḍ-r 25, kh-ḍ-r 8, ḍ-r-ʻ 7, n-ḍ-r 3, ḍ-m-r (ḍāmir, 22:27), ḍ-y-r (lā ḍayr, 26:50) and ḍarīʻ (88:6) — and 74 words of the root in 34 written forms.
BY FORM: ḍarr 10; ḍurr 19; ḍarrāʼ 9; ḍarar 1 (4:95); ḍirār 2 (2:231, 9:107); muḍārr 1 (4:12); the active participle ḍārr 2 (2:102, 58:10); the third form 3 (2:233, 2:282, 65:6); the first form 19; the eighth form 8 (2:126, 2:173, 5:3, 6:119, 6:145, 16:115, 27:62, 31:24).
BY SUBJECT: ALLAH THE ONE WHO TOUCHES, INTENDS OR DRIVES 10 — touches with adversity (6:17, 10:107), intends it (36:23, 39:38 twice, 48:11), seizes nations with adversity (6:42, 7:94), drives to punishment (2:126, 31:24); HE REMOVES IT OR ANSWERS THE ONE DRIVEN TO NEED 5 (10:12, 16:54, 21:84, 23:75, 27:62); ADVERSITY TOUCHES PEOPLE 16 (10:12 twice, 12:88, 16:53, 17:67, 21:83, 30:33, 39:8, 39:49, 7:95, 10:21, 11:10, 41:50, 2:177, 2:214, 3:134); RIVALS OWN NO HARM OR BENEFIT 14 (5:76, 6:71, 10:18, 10:106, 13:16, 17:56, 20:89, 21:66, 22:12, 22:13, 25:3, 25:55, 26:73, 34:42), and the Prophet ﷺ none for himself 3 (7:188, 10:49, 72:21); PEOPLE CANNOT HARM ALLAH 6 (3:144, 3:176, 3:177, 9:39, 11:57, 47:32); ENEMIES, MAGIC AND SECRET COUNSEL HARM ONLY BY LEAVE 8 (2:102 twice, 3:111, 3:120, 4:113, 5:42, 5:105, 58:10); HARM BETWEEN PEOPLE, IN LAW AND DISABILITY 7 (2:231, 2:233, 2:282, 4:12, 65:6, 9:107, 4:95); NECESSITY IN FOOD LAW 5 (2:173, 5:3, 6:119, 6:145, 16:115). 10 + 5 + 16 + 17 + 6 + 8 + 7 + 5 = 74. The definite aḍ-ḍārr stands in no āyah, and the participle is said of Allah nowhere. Seventeen verses set the root beside a word of n-f-ʻ. Massa, touch, is the verb in fifteen verses of the root (2:214, 6:17, 7:95, 10:12, 10:21, 10:107, 11:10, 12:88, 16:53, 17:67, 21:83, 30:33, 39:8, 39:49, 41:50); 3:120 and 7:188 have massa beside the root with another object.
CORRECTED ON THE RECORD, THE PAGE: the desc said that mainstream Sunni scholarship holds this Name may be said of Allah only alongside An-Nāfiʻ — no source read gives that; struck as unchecked; the pairing now rests on what was read: both lists set an-nāfiʻ directly after aḍ-ḍārr, and Ibn Fāris gives the root as the opposite of benefit. The desc’s decreed by measure in each particular case and the Name withholds the reason were from no source read; struck; the desc now rests on Ibn Fāris, the count, 6:17, 48:11, 21:84, the two lists and at-Tirmidhī 1940. The ref cited Ṣaḥīḥ Muslim 771a and Jāmiʻ at-Tirmidhī 3507 in forms the book does not use, quoted 48:11 and 6:17 in words not the book’s, named 39:53, carried at Name 34, for a point the page does not make, and gave no count; rebuilt on the count, Ibn Fāris, aṭ-Ṭabarī and the six editions. The root block rested on the desc and had no senseNote; the gloss is Ibn Fāris’s. The 6:17 note spelled the Name Ad-Dārr and said the Names are taken as a pair with no one named; rewritten on aṭ-Ṭabarī. The 21:83 and 12:87 notes pointed at MEDS; the 12:87 note did not say the verse carries no word of the root, which stands in the next verse, 12:88. The 21:69 note pointed at POEMS and told of the verse having had no card before; it carries no word of the root, and the note says so. The Duʻāʼ source joined two records and a narrator’s name, and its grade joined two records’ verdicts; the note gave a Dārussalām row of ḥasan that the dataset does not have (its row is isnād ḥasan) and said the supplication protects that day or that night, which neither record says. At-Tirmidhī 3388 is the source alone: its chain is named throughout and the root stands in its reward; its grade gives that record’s rows. Abū Dāwūd 5088, with an unnamed narrator before Abān and a reward of no sudden affliction, and Ibn Mājah 3869, with at-Tirmidhī’s chain, stand in the note with their rows. Name 6 carries the same entry exactly; its source and grade match. The Muslim 2664 note told of the narrator’s name having stood in the source field; rewritten on the record, which carries no word of the root and no sub-letter in the dataset. MEDS 91 carried the banned Most Merciful in its quotation of 21:83 and in its close — the second half given in transliteration; carried His hand — reworded; quoted 6:17, 48:11 and 12:87 in words not the book’s — set word for word; said much of Sunni scholarship holds the paired-Name rule and that the Qurʼan never splits the two — the first struck as unchecked, the second false, since 6:17 and 10:107 answer ḍurr with khayr and 21:83 sets nothing against it; cited Ṣaḥīḥ Muslim without a number and said scholars have worked over the line with great care — now Muslim 771a, the unattributed sentence struck; said nothing in Him took pleasure in it and that the Prophet ﷺ sought refuge from harm constantly — struck, the second now at-Tirmidhī 3388; and said Ayyūb spoke after years of it, a length the verse does not give — struck. POEMS 91 quoted 48:11 in words not the book’s — set. CH 91 put the woman whose form Yusra filled in both in the next street and two streets away — the next street; and her whose hand it was is whose decree it was. A second Study Note for this Name, headed Ad-Darr, stood earlier in the guide; it is removed.
THE SIX EDITIONS: aḍ-ḍārr stands only in the two lists, at-Tirmidhī 3507, al-māniʻ aḍ-ḍārr an-nāfiʻ (Aḥmad Shākir, al-Albānī and Darussalam: ḍaʻīf), and Ibn Mājah 3861, al-qawiyy ash-shadīd aḍ-ḍārr an-nāfiʻ (Shuʻayb al-Arnaʼūṭ: isnād ḍaʻīf with the list; Darussalam: ḍaʻīf; al-Albānī: ṣaḥīḥ without it). ḌĀRR OF RAIN: nāfiʻan ghayra ḍārr, Abū Dāwūd 1169 (al-Albānī and Muḥammad Muḥyī ad-Dīn ʻAbd al-Ḥamīd: ṣaḥīḥ; Shuʻayb al-Arnaʼūṭ: ḥasan; Darussalam: isnād ḥasan) and Ibn Mājah 1269 (al-Albānī: ṣaḥīḥ; Shuʻayb al-Arnaʼūṭ: ṣaḥīḥ li-ghayrih; Darussalam: ḍaʻīf). ALLAH THE DOER OF A VERB OF Ḍ-R-R: only man ḍārra ḍārra llāhu bihi, at-Tirmidhī 1940 (at-Tirmidhī: ḥasan gharīb), with aḍarra llāhu bihi at Abū Dāwūd 3635 and Ibn Mājah 2342; no report makes Allah the subject of ḍarra or yaḍurru. He removes ḍurr when called, Abū Dāwūd 4084. People cannot reach harming Him, Muslim 2577a, carried at Names 16, 29, 88 and 94; people harm only what Allah has written, at-Tirmidhī 2516, carried at Names 7, 38, 64 and 70, and its benefit and harm portion at Name 92. Look-alikes: kalb ḍārin, the hunting dog, al-Bukhārī 5481 and 5482 and Muslim 1574e; mā ḍāra dhālika, of ḍ-y-r, Muslim 1443; al-Bukhārī’s own note at 1560 on ḍāra yaḍīru, ḍāra yaḍūru and ḍarra yaḍurru. Letter by letter: every printed Qurʼan string is exact or a contiguous part of its verse; the supplication’s Arabic stands in at-Tirmidhī 3388, Abū Dāwūd 5088 and Ibn Mājah 3869 and no other record; each ḥadīth portion is one contiguous run of its record. The Muslim records carry no grade rows. Added: at-Tirmidhī 1940, Abū Dāwūd 4084, and Muslim 771a from labbayka to laysa ilayk, whose clause stands also at Abū Dāwūd 760, at-Tirmidhī 3422 and an-Nasāʼī 897, while Abū Dāwūd 761 names it only as omitted.
READ: Ibn Fāris, Maqāyīs al-Lughah, vol. 3, pp. 360–361, in his own text — three origins, the opposite of benefit, the gathering of a thing, and strength; aḍ-ḍarr the opposite of an-nafʻ; aḍ-ḍurr emaciation; aḍ-ḍirr and aḍ-ḍarrah of the co-wife; uḍṭurra from aḍ-ḍarūrah; aḍ-ḍarīr, patience and strength of soul. Aṭ-Ṭabarī at 6:17, 21:83 (with 21:84) and 58:10; as-Saʻdī at 21:83.
NOT READ: ar-Rāghib, Lisān al-ʻArab and al-Khalīl for ḍ-r-r in print. Of the six tafsīrs, what is still owed is the full entry rather than the root passage: Ibn Kathīr at every verse of this page but the first and 48:11; al-Baghawī at 5:76, 36:23, 39:38 and the call of Ayyūb; Ibn ʻĀshūr at 5:76, 10:107, 36:23 and 39:38; al-Qurṭubī at the pair on Ayyūb; as-Saʻdī at 10:107, 36:23, 39:38 and the last verse of the page. Aṭ-Ṭabarī is now read at every verse of this page, and all six were swept for the root at the two verses that carry no word of it. The six tafsīr files for every āyah of Names 91 to 97 are downloaded.
OPEN: Ibn al-Qayyim’s Badāʼiʻ al-Fawāʼid on the paired-Name rule, recorded below, in print. The meditation’s readings — harm that exists in what is decreed and not in the decreeing, nothing in the decree purposeless, the extent and the ending of harm fixed before it arrives, half of a sovereignty not a description of Him — are the author’s. The poem’s fire still by every measure available that day, the same flame that would have taken anyone else, and the morning He spoke coolness into a furnace go beyond 21:69, which gives the command only, and are the poem’s.
COHERENCE: Name 6’s Duʻāʼ source and grade for the same supplication match this page, and its Study Note records it. Name 34’s NAMED line said 10:107 was carried at no Name, and Name 44’s said 21:84; both now say Name 91, and Name 44’s open item on the fa-stajabnā lahu verses is narrowed to 21:76 and 21:90. 6:17 and 48:11 stay identical with Name 92. The edition count moves from 681 to 686. The meditation’s quotations of 6:17, 48:11, 12:87, the first half of 21:83 and Muslim 771a, and the poem’s of 21:69 and 48:11, match the book’s English word for word. AFTER THE CHAT-END AUDIT OF 81–85: the grade field of Abū Dāwūd 5088; at-Tirmidhī 3388 (narrated by ʻUthmān ibn ʻAffān) now gives every grader in the dataset’s rows, each attributed to its record (the grade survey).
AFTER NAME 92: at-Tirmidhī 2516’s portion on benefit and harm is now carried at Name 92, and the six-editions line says so.
AFTER NAME 94: Name 94 carries another portion of Muslim 2577a, and the carried-at line says so. AFTER THE CHAT-END AUDIT OF 1–99: the English of 21:69 drops its quotation marks and follows the book’s form for speech; in the note to the record of Abū Jurayy the second mention of the Messenger of Allah ﷺ takes the mark, as the first in that sentence already does, while the words a questioner speaks inside a report keep the address as they stand. ON THE AUTHOR’S DECISION, THE SPEAKER AT 21:69: the author has settled the rendering this page left him. The verse read Allah said: O fire, where the Arabic is qulnā, We said; it now reads We said, which is what the book gives everywhere else the Book speaks in that plural, and in particular on Name 13’s page, where the same verb reads then We said to the angels. The debt the old wording was paying, that a reader should not take the plural for more than One, is paid in the note instead: aṭ-Ṭabarī fills the ellipsis with We said to the fire and introduces the passage as the speech of Allah, the Exalted in mention. The verse is carried at this Name alone; the poem here and the poem at Name 92 quote only the vocative clause, which is unchanged. The item is closed. AFTER THE TAFSĪR READING AT NAME 91: the four commentators this note recorded as not read at any verse of the page were read at the first verse, and al-Qurṭubī at the third, and what they give is now in those two notes. The best of it answers the page rather than adding to it: the note at the first verse had observed on its own that the second half answers with khayr and not with nafʻ, and Ibn ʻĀshūr names that as opposition by the more general and as iḥtibāk, citing Ibn ʻAṭiyyah that ḍurr there stands in the place of sharr. Al-Qurṭubī and al-Baghawī give touching and uncovering as figure and the hardship as poverty, illness or trial; Ibn Kathīr opens with Allah as the owner of harm and benefit; al-Qurṭubī at the third verse confirms the occasion the note already gives and adds that the asking for forgiveness was words the askers did not believe. Nothing on the page was found false and no claim came off it. One fact about the dataset, so that a later reading does not take it for two witnesses: at Ibn Kathīr, aṭ-Ṭabarī, al-Qurṭubī and Ibn ʻĀshūr the file for 21:84 carries the same block as the file for 21:83, word for word, and only al-Baghawī comments the two verses apart. The other nine verses of this page, and Names 92 to 97, stand where the reading list leaves them, with their files downloaded and unread. AFTER THE TAFSĪR READING AT THE REST OF NAME 91: the nine verses the record above leaves downloaded and unread are read, and that closing sentence no longer stands. Aṭ-Ṭabarī, who was owed at five verses, is now read at every verse of the page, and every verse of the page was swept for the root in all six tafsīrs. Two corrections on the record. First, the count in the record above is wrong: the file for 21:84 repeats the file for 21:83 not at four of the six but at five, as-Saʻdī duplicating with the other four, so al-Baghawī is the only second witness at that pair and the remaining five are one witness and not two. Second, of the two verses of this page that carry no word of the root, none of the six raises the root at the first of them, which corroborates the page rather than adding to it, while at the second al-Baghawī alone puts the root’s verb into the telling, twice, both times denying harm to the one his Lord protects. What the reading gives the notes, in order: al-Qurṭubī argues from what the Christians themselves concede, that one who in any state neither heard nor saw nor knew nor benefited nor harmed cannot be a god, and closes that the One owning harm and benefit is God in truth, which is this page’s thesis in a commentator’s words; al-Baghawī reports the variant that takes the harm word with the short a because it stands opposite benefit, so that the pairing the page rests on is what settles the reading; aṭ-Ṭabarī answers the excuse of those who stayed behind with the very two things they pleaded, their property and their people; Ibn ʻĀshūr takes the light touch as Ayyūb’s courtesy toward his Lord and names the closing praise as an indirect asking, which answers the observation the note makes on its own, that nothing stands against the harm there but mercy, for the mercy is the asking; al-Baghawī alone tells that uncovering as a bodily thing, outward then inward; al-Qurṭubī carries the account in which the man who refused the intercession of gods was himself a man of harm those gods could not uncover in seventy years and whose harm his Lord uncovered in one morning, which is the first verse’s own uncovering told as a life; al-Qurṭubī also gives the rule that an active participle meaning what is to come governs the noun after it, while one meaning what is past stands in construct, a rule that bears on this Name, which is an active participle of its root; and at the last verse Ibn ʻĀshūr reads the denial as consolation, the harming participle belonging to Shayṭān and the leave to Allah. Nothing on the page was found false and no claim came off it. What is still owed here is the full entry and not the root passage, at the places the line above names, and Names 92 to 97 stand where the reading list leaves them, with their files downloaded and unread.
BY THE AUTHOR’S DECISIONS OF 2026-09-25, IN BUILD 182: Muslim 2664’s clause reads strive for what benefits you, seek help from Allah, and do not feel helpless, one English with Name 53 (A62).
IN BUILD 192, FROM THE PHASE 2 READING: the ref gives Allah as the doer of ḍārra at at-Tirmidhī 1940 and of aḍarra at Abū Dāwūd 3635 and Ibn Mājah 2342, as the ḥadīth note does; the class of enemies, magic and secret counsel keeps its eight words, but only bi-ḍārrīna at 2:102 and 58:10 say except by Allah’s leave: 3:111 limits the harm to hurt, 3:120, 4:113, 5:42 and 5:105 deny it, and yaḍurruhum at 2:102 is the magic harming those who learn it, and the ref now says so; Muslim 1443, filed above among the look-alikes as mā ḍāra of ḍ-y-r, reads first law kāna dhālika ḍārran ḍarra Fārisa wa-r-Rūm, the participle and the verb of this root said of withdrawal, and only its wording from Zuhayr has mā ḍāra; at-Tirmidhī 1487, kalban laysa bi-ḍārin, is the hunting dog with al-Bukhārī 5481 and 5482 and Muslim 1574e; the 58:10 note says one of the two places the first form’s participle stands, since muḍārr at 4:12 is the third form’s, and gives Ibn ʻĀshūr’s two referents for it, Shayṭān or the counsel; al-Qurṭubī at 48:11, said above to confirm the occasion, tells the same hanging back but sets it in the year of the conquest, and al-Ḥudaybiyah is al-Baghawī’s and Ibn ʻĀshūr’s; the ref and the notes at 2:102, 21:83, 36:23, 39:38, 48:11 and 58:10 no longer describe this page.
IN BUILD 195, FROM THE BACKLOG READING OF THE LEXICA: ar-Rāghib (al-Mufradāt, p. 503), Lisān al-ʻArab (vol. 4, p. 482) and al-Khalīl (al-ʻAyn, vol. 7, p. 6) are read at Shamela through its page reader, not in print, for ḍ-r-r: aḍ-ḍurr an ill state in the soul, the body or the outward condition; Lisān names an-nāfiʻ aḍ-ḍārr together, and he and al-Khalīl give aḍ-ḍarr and aḍ-ḍurr as two dialects, the ḍād opened when harm is joined to benefit; nothing on this page is at odds with them, and the NOT READ line owes them only in print.
IN BUILD 206, FROM THE BACKLOG READING OF THE GRADES: the grades of Ibn Mājah’s list are read in the editions’ text at Shamela through its page reader, not in print: al-Albānī grades the report ṣaḥīḥ without the enumeration of the Names; Shuʻayb al-Arnaʼūṭ gives its isnād as ḍaʻīf with the Names, their naming an insertion by some narrators, the report without them standing in al-Bukhārī; Muḥammad Fuʼād ʻAbd al-Bāqī’s edition gives no verdict of its own and quotes az-Zawāʼid, that Ibn Mājah’s route is ḍaʻīf; the ṣaḥīḥ and ḥasan ṣaḥīḥ this page gave the list were the dataset’s rows and not the editions’ verdicts on it, and the ref and the line on the six editions now give the editions’ verdicts.
IN BUILD 207, FROM THE READING OF THE GRADES: Muḥammad Fuʼād ʻAbd al-Bāqī is no longer named as a grader on this page: the row the ḥadīth dataset gives in his name is al-Albānī’s ruling as it is printed with ʻAbd al-Bāqī’s edition of Ibn Mājah, read at Shamela through its page reader, not in print, and the edition gives no verdict of its own beyond quoting az-Zawāʼid; al-Albānī’s grade stands where it stood, and earlier records keep their words.
IN BUILD 207, FROM THE BACKLOG READING OF THE SOURCES ON THE NAME: Ibn al-Qayyim, Badāʼiʻ al-Fawāʼid, vol. 1, pp. 294–295, read at Shamela through its page reader, not in print, states the rule in his seventeenth point: most of His Names are said of Him alone and paired, and some, as al-Māniʻ, aḍ-Ḍārr and al-Muntaqim, may not be singled out from their opposites; He is al-Muʻṭī al-Māniʻ, aḍ-Ḍārr an-Nāfiʻ, al-ʻAfuww al-Muntaqim, al-Muʻizz al-Mudhill, the perfection being in each joined to its opposite, since what is meant is His sole lordship in giving and withholding, benefit and harm, pardon and retribution, and He is not praised by withholding, retribution and harm alone; such paired Names run as one Name, which is why they are said of Him only joined; the OPEN line no longer asks who states it.