ShowHide the Study Notes (1,546 words)
CARRIED ON THIS PAGE: 11:73, ḥamīdun majīd, shared with Name 56 and Name 65; 85:15, dhū l-ʻarshi l-majīd, shared with Name 65; and two appended in this pass — 50:1, the definite Name-form said of the Qurʼan in an oath, and 85:21, the indefinite said of the Qurʼan six verses after 85:15. With those two the page carries every occurrence of its own root in the Book. Neither was then carried at any other Name (both are carried at Name 65 since its own pass, each linked exactly: corrected in build 171), so no reciprocal quran links were needed, and the distinct verse count in Notes on This Edition moves from 431 to 433.
NAMED HERE BUT NOT CARRIED ON THIS PAGE: nothing. Every verse this entry names is on the page.
CORRECTED ON THE RECORD, THE COUNT: the root gives four words in the whole Qurʼan. The house window on all three radicals, at most two letters in each gap, returns thirty-six (the first and third alone return 416: corrected in build 171), and thirty-two of them are look-alikes: twenty-eight are the masjid and the masājid, from s-j-d, and four are the mujāhidūn, from j-h-d. Of the four real words, one is of Allah past dispute, one is of Allah or of His Throne by the vowel, and two are of the Qurʼan; the entry named all four and the page carried two. The root has no second face at all, which is the rarer finding: Ibn Fāris states in his own words that it occurs only in what is praised, and the count agrees, every one of the four falling on Allah, on His Throne or on His Book. FOUND / CORRECTED / REMOVED, AS UNVERIFIED: the desc glossed majd as glory at once elevated and abundant, and said the Arabs used it of pasture both high and rich. The height is not in the lexicons read here. Ibn Fāris gives the root as the reaching of the utmost; ar-Rāghib as amplitude in generosity and majesty, tracing it to a herd coming upon pasture much and wide, and Ibn Fāris prefers the reading of the same idiom as feeding the beast what sufficed it, saying that is closer to the analogy of the chapter. The page named Ḥamzah, al-Kisāʼī and Khalaf as the readers of the genitive at 85:15; nothing read this pass names them, so the attribution is struck at Name 48 and at Name 65 together, and what was verified is put in its place. It is struck as unchecked rather than as false, and can be restored by anyone who reads a book of the readings (named again in build 171 as Ibn ʻĀshūr, al-Baghawī and aṭ-Ṭabarī report them in the pinned tafsīr; a book of the readings is still unread). The ref carried a citation against house form, Jāmiʻ at-Tirmidhī 3507, and did not say that the enumeration it rests on is graded ḍaʻīf. The Duʻāʼ page had no grade at all, and paired two editions in one source field although its own note said their wordings differ.
READ: Ibn Fāris, Maqāyīs al-Lugha, in his own text at the entry مَجَدَ; ar-Rāghib’s Mufradāt, Ibn al-Athīr through Majmaʻ Biḥār, al-Jawharī, Ibn Sīda, al-Fayyūmī, az-Zamakhsharī, Abū Ḥayyān, Abū Mūsā al-Madīnī, Lane, Tāj al-ʻArūs and Lisān al-ʻArab, all in their own texts at the entry مجد; aṭ-Ṭabarī at 50:1 and Ibn Kathīr at 85:21; the six Arabic ḥadīth editions for every printed string on this page.
NOT READ: any book of the qirāʼāt, which is why the named readers were struck; and al-Ghazālī’s al-Maqṣad al-Asnā, still not reached in his own text.
OPEN: the report of ʻĀʼishah, hand me al-Majīd, meaning the muṣḥaf, is carried by the Lisān, by an-Nihāya and by Abū Mūsā al-Madīnī, and is not in the six editions; it is named here as what the lexicons report and is not cited as a ḥadīth. Saʻd ibn ʻUbādah’s prayer, that the Lisān records — O Allah, grant me praise and glory, for there is no glory but by deeds and no deeds but by wealth — is an athar and is likewise not cited. And Name 65 then said the distinction between the two Names is grammatical rather than scriptural (closed below: corrected in build 171); Ibn Fāris names both of Allah in one sentence, so that page should be raised when its own pass comes.
COHERENCE: 11:73 keeps its links to Names 56 and 65 and 85:15 its link to Name 65, and the struck attribution is struck at both pages in the same edit so that they do not disagree. SHARED_LOCI gains a reciprocal ḥadīth link between Names 48 and 56, of the another-portion kind: this page prints the answer to the fourth verse of al-Fātiḥah and Name 56 prints the answer to the second, out of one report. The salawāt on this page closes on the two Names that 11:73 closes on, which are this Name and Name 56. Al-Bukhārī 3370 is also printed on Name 56’s Duʻāʼ page with the same source and grade, and the two are linked in SHARED_LOCI; its note here no longer says it is the most often recited text or that it is said in every prayer, neither of which the six editions state.
HYGIENE AFTER NAME 61: the Qurʼan note on 85:21 narrated the page’s own editing — six verses after 85:15 and in the same sūrah, and the page had named it without carrying it — and the clause is removed with the fact it carried kept. AFTER THE CHAT-END AUDIT OF 81–85: the grade field of at-Tirmidhī 1955 now gives every grader in the dataset’s rows, each attributed to its record (the grade survey). AFTER THE CHAT-END AUDIT OF 1–99: the capitalised runs in the desc and the ref are set in lower case, the words unchanged. the item left for Name 65 is closed: its desc now grounds the Name in Ibn Fāris, who names Allah al-Mājid and al-Majīd in one sentence. ON THE AUTHOR’S LIST, THE KIND ON 11:73: the item in the author’s list said that SHARED_LOCI gives 11:73 the exact kind at Names 48, 56 and 65 though Name 48 prints the whole āyah and the other two a portion. The map was read again for this and no longer says that, if it ever did after Name 65’s pass: Names 56 and 65 are e to each other, which is right, since they print the same portion with the same English, and each is x to Name 48, which is right too, since Name 48 prints the whole verse, whose close is their English word for word (not a different English: corrected in build 171). Nothing was decided and nothing changed; the item is closed as already answered.
IN BUILD 171, FROM THE PHASE 2 READING: the note on Muslim 395a names Name 65, which carries this portion identically, gives the verse Name 56’s portion answers in the book’s English rather than by number, and has athnā ʻalayya ʻabdī answer ar-Raḥmān ar-Raḥīm between the two answers; the note on at-Tirmidhī 1955 reads the report as thanks, which is what its three records say; the ref names Ibn Mājah 3861’s enumeration beside at-Tirmidhī 3507 (its rows: al-Albānī and ʻAbd al-Bāqī ṣaḥīḥ, al-Arnaʼūṭ ḥasan ṣaḥīḥ, Darussalam ḍaʻīf), no longer narrates the page, sets Ibn Kathīr’s gloss of the tablet as its own sentence, and gives an-Nihāya through Majmaʻ Biḥār, as the desc and the senseNote now give Ibn al-Athīr; the 85:15 note names the readers of each vowel from Ibn ʻĀshūr, with al-Baghawī and aṭ-Ṭabarī, at the pinned tafsīr, as Name 65’s now does; the 85:21 note gives al-Qurṭubī’s readers of the construct reading, Ibn as-Samayfaʻ and Abū Ḥaywah; the note on al-Bukhārī 3370 names the one telling of Kaʻb’s report in the six that carries the printed wording, which Ibn Mājah 906 carries too as Ibn Masʻūd’s own teaching, ḍaʻīf; and the carriage of 50:1 and 85:21, the sweep, the readers struck, the item on Name 65 and the English of 11:73 are corrected in place above.
BY THE AUTHOR’S DECISIONS OF 2026-09-25, IN BUILD 182: the English title is The Glorious in all seven arrays and the meditation’s title fields, the ids and slugs unchanged (A53); 11:73 closes Truly He is Praiseworthy, Glorious, here and at Names 56 and 65, and MEDS 48 quotes it so (A58); al-Bukhārī 6408 is carried on the Ḥadīth page in his English, the servants glorifying Him in the angels’ report, its opening left out and at-Tirmidhī 3600 named as the parallel; at-Tirmidhī 1955 stays, its note corrected in build 171 (A59).
IN BUILD 206, FROM THE BACKLOG READING OF THE GRADES: the rows the record of build 171 above gives the list are the dataset’s; the grades of Ibn Mājah’s list are read in the editions’ text at Shamela through its page reader, not in print: al-Albānī grades the report ṣaḥīḥ without the enumeration of the Names; Shuʻayb al-Arnaʼūṭ gives its isnād as ḍaʻīf with the Names, their naming an insertion by some narrators, the report without them standing in al-Bukhārī; Muḥammad Fuʼād ʻAbd al-Bāqī’s edition gives no verdict of its own and quotes az-Zawāʼid, that Ibn Mājah’s route is ḍaʻīf; Name 12 gives the editions’ verdicts.